On 19/11/14 10:00, rickman wrote:> > Whoa! I'm not sure I remember what it feels like to have someone > "agree" with me... :) >You've been hanging out in s.e.d. too much, where we all disagree on principle. Or maybe comp.arch.fpga, were people can't understand enough of each others posts to agree :-)
Interesting question on sci.engr.control
Started by ●November 18, 2014
Reply by ●November 19, 20142014-11-19
Reply by ●November 19, 20142014-11-19
On Tue, 18 Nov 2014 20:53:29 -0600, Tim Wescott <tim@seemywebsite.com> wrote:>On Tue, 18 Nov 2014 23:16:53 +0000, Eric Jacobsen wrote: > >> On Tue, 18 Nov 2014 12:22:27 -0600, Tim Wescott >> <seemywebsite@myfooter.really> wrote: >> >>>Title says it -- there's an interesting and on-topic question on the >>>usually-moribund sci.engr.control. I'd love it if that group came to >>>life again, so feel free to go look! >>> >>>(I told the guy to post it there OR to comp.dsp -- I maybe should have >>>mentioned cross-posting. Oh well.) >>> >>>((And pardon me for spamming a bit. I hope it's for a good cause. If >>>not, I could start hawking solutions manuals.)) >> >> So what was the question? > >It pertained to modeling motors in the z domain. You could go look.Was trying to determine whether it was worth the time. The cry of the barker saying, "Come look behind the curtain!" with inadequate information of what might be found is usually not worth the trip. Eric Jacobsen Anchor Hill Communications http://www.anchorhill.com
Reply by ●November 19, 20142014-11-19
On Wed, 19 Nov 2014 20:07:08 +0000, Eric Jacobsen wrote:> On Tue, 18 Nov 2014 20:53:29 -0600, Tim Wescott <tim@seemywebsite.com> > wrote: > >>On Tue, 18 Nov 2014 23:16:53 +0000, Eric Jacobsen wrote: >> >>> On Tue, 18 Nov 2014 12:22:27 -0600, Tim Wescott >>> <seemywebsite@myfooter.really> wrote: >>> >>>>Title says it -- there's an interesting and on-topic question on the >>>>usually-moribund sci.engr.control. I'd love it if that group came to >>>>life again, so feel free to go look! >>>> >>>>(I told the guy to post it there OR to comp.dsp -- I maybe should have >>>>mentioned cross-posting. Oh well.) >>>> >>>>((And pardon me for spamming a bit. I hope it's for a good cause. If >>>>not, I could start hawking solutions manuals.)) >>> >>> So what was the question? >> >>It pertained to modeling motors in the z domain. You could go look. > > Was trying to determine whether it was worth the time. The cry of the > barker saying, "Come look behind the curtain!" with inadequate > information of what might be found is usually not worth the trip.Oh, but the barker is _me_, so that's different. At any rate, it's a control newbie who's at the stage where you want to put theory into practice, and he's trying to figure out how to model motors to that end. -- Tim Wescott Wescott Design Services http://www.wescottdesign.com
Reply by ●November 19, 20142014-11-19
On 11/19/2014 5:19 AM, David Brown wrote:> On 19/11/14 10:00, rickman wrote: >> >> Whoa! I'm not sure I remember what it feels like to have someone >> "agree" with me... :) >> > > You've been hanging out in s.e.d. too much, where we all disagree on > principle. Or maybe comp.arch.fpga, were people can't understand enough > of each others posts to agree :-)Hanging in s.e.d at all can be too much. Although I did get some really helpful advice from Joerg there... unless he is hanging out in rec.radio.amateur.equipment these days. I cross posted. -- Rick
Reply by ●November 19, 20142014-11-19
On Wed, 19 Nov 2014 19:17:15 -0500, rickman wrote:> On 11/19/2014 5:19 AM, David Brown wrote: >> On 19/11/14 10:00, rickman wrote: >>> >>> Whoa! I'm not sure I remember what it feels like to have someone >>> "agree" with me... :) >>> >>> >> You've been hanging out in s.e.d. too much, where we all disagree on >> principle. Or maybe comp.arch.fpga, were people can't understand >> enough of each others posts to agree :-) > > Hanging in s.e.d at all can be too much. Although I did get some really > helpful advice from Joerg there... unless he is hanging out in > rec.radio.amateur.equipment these days. I cross posted.Possibly both. He's certainly an s.e.d regular. I still say, if you can't stand the heat in the s.e.d kitchen, go visit rec.crafts.metalworking. You'll come back with an appreciation for the courtesy and open-mindedness displayed by the folks on s.e.d (and a bigger kill file, too). -- Tim Wescott Wescott Design Services http://www.wescottdesign.com
Reply by ●November 24, 20142014-11-24
Op Wed, 19 Nov 2014 04:50:02 +0100 schreef John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandtechnology.com>:> On Tue, 18 Nov 2014 20:53:29 -0600, Tim Wescott <tim@seemywebsite.com> > wrote: > >> On Tue, 18 Nov 2014 23:16:53 +0000, Eric Jacobsen wrote: >> >>> On Tue, 18 Nov 2014 12:22:27 -0600, Tim Wescott >>> <seemywebsite@myfooter.really> wrote: >>> >>>> Title says it -- there's an interesting and on-topic question on the >>>> usually-moribund sci.engr.control. I'd love it if that group came to >>>> life again, so feel free to go look! >>>> >>>> (I told the guy to post it there OR to comp.dsp -- I maybe should have >>>> mentioned cross-posting. Oh well.) >>>> >>>> ((And pardon me for spamming a bit. I hope it's for a good cause. If >>>> not, I could start hawking solutions manuals.)) >>> >>> So what was the question? >> >> It pertained to modeling motors in the z domain. You could go look. > > That group seems to be 100% spam.Seriously, get a better news server. aioe.org is free to use and free of spam. (Though, because of its connection restrictions, I'm using a relay to it.) -- (Remove the obvious prefix to reply privately.) Gemaakt met Opera's e-mailprogramma: http://www.opera.com/mail/
