Re: Sampling Theorem and the input S/H, sampling aperture, outputZero Order Hold

Jim,

Can you either stop intentially re-arranging the letters and spacings
in the subject line of these posts ... or if it's unintentional, fix
your usenet posting application so it stops doing so?  It's a little
disorientating to have a thread breaking off into 5 or 6 different
permutations within the group ( appears to be localized to each of
your replies ).

Regards,

Robert

jim <"N0sp"@m.sjedging@mwt.net> wrote:

>
>
>robert bristow-johnson wrote:
>>  other than the gain getting smaller and smaller, the
>> only other effect is to reduce this aperture effect to get closer and closer
>> to sampling at the ideal instance. 
>
>This is not true. Even a wide aperture samples just as closely or
>possibly even closer to the ideal instance. The regularity and
>self-similarity of each acquisition is what effects the capability for
>sampling at the ideal instance not the measure of time over which the
>sample is acquired as you claim .
>
>-jim


( modify address for return mail )

www.numbersusa.com
www.americanpatrol.com