I've got an idea, but for it to work, I need 3 bits transmitted (over
wireless) at a symbol rate of around 12 MHz. Is this possible?
Would 8-psk be my best bet?
-mw
Data rate of 8psk
Started by ●April 19, 2005
Reply by ●April 19, 20052005-04-19
I think, you might be better off if you use channel coding together with higher-order alphabet. Ex: Rate-3/4 code followed by 16-QAM. regards Ramesh
Reply by ●April 19, 20052005-04-19
Mikal wrote:> I've got an idea, but for it to work, I need 3 bits transmitted (over > wireless) at a symbol rate of around 12 MHz. Is this possible? > Would 8-psk be my best bet? > > -mwThere are few mind readers here. How many bits per symbol are there? What happens after the three bits are transmitted? What happens before? If you choose a 6 GHz carrier, I don't see why there's even a question, so there must be important constraints you haven't mentioned. Jerry -- Engineering is the art of making what you want from things you can get. �����������������������������������������������������������������������
Reply by ●April 19, 20052005-04-19
There's already an ETSI wireless standard for 8psk constellations called 'EDGE'. The symbol rate is around 270kHz, and the ETSI standards body specifies EDGE receivers to handle around 5 symbols of ISI from multipath/fading. If your receiver faced a similar air channel, it would need to handle over 200 symbols of ISI. The optimal receiver for 8psk modulation with 200 symbols of ISI is a Viterbi EQ with 5e+179 states. If you build such a receiver, please post your results.
Reply by ●April 20, 20052005-04-20
It's also not clear whether single or multi-carrier (e.g., OFDM) modulation will be used. If you use OFDM, sure, you don't have such a complex equalizer to implement.
Reply by ●April 25, 20052005-04-25
Yes, I am narrowing it down. I'm considering 16-qam. My symbol would consist of 4 bits @ a rate of about 3 MHz (about 12Mb/Sec). This sounds very do-able... right?
Reply by ●April 25, 20052005-04-25
> Yes, I am narrowing it down. I'm considering 16-qam. My symbol > would consist of 4 bits @ a rate of about 3 MHz (about 12Mb/Sec). > This sounds very do-able... right?It will depend on the bandwidth and SNR of the air channel (and any other air channel signal distortions, e.g. Doppler fading). Perhaps you can tell us a bit about the application--are you designing a mobile phone or stationary wireless LAN, etc.?
Reply by ●April 26, 20052005-04-26
On 25 Apr 2005 11:27:54 -0700, "Mikal" <accclass101@hotmail.com> wrote:>Yes, I am narrowing it down. I'm considering 16-qam. My symbol >would consist of 4 bits @ a rate of about 3 MHz (about 12Mb/Sec). This >sounds very do-able... right?I agree with posing questions to you as others have, like what types of channels does this need to survive? Indoor? Outdoor? What sort of range? Is multipath a problem? etc., etc... With any sort of substantive range there will probably be impairments such as noise and multipath reflections that reduce the reliability enough that you may need some coding for error protection. This will affect the net number of information bits per symbol. e.g., with a code of R = 1/2 you'd need to double the symbol rate to maintain the 12Mbps information rate, but the reliability will go way up. But maybe your application doesn't care about errors. If you provide a bit more info then you might get more helpful answers. Eric Jacobsen Minister of Algorithms, Intel Corp. My opinions may not be Intel's opinions. http://www.ericjacobsen.org
Reply by ●April 29, 20052005-04-29
Dang it. I wrote this whole paragraph on my application, and then lost
it! DANG...
O.K... to summerize (with spelling errors),
My block diagram is as follows
25 MHz serial data -> symbol formater(fpga) -> PHY ->analog front
end/TX 0>---(open air)---> then in reverse.
What I'm at the learning curve of is... the PHY. How to format the
I&Q for the PHY. Becuase it's only 4 bits(for a total possibility of 16
patters)... would that mean that "I" (DAC) get 2 bits, and Q (DAC) gets
2 bits? And, I can't find a whole lot on how the PHY on the recieving
end either determines where to sample the analog and at what point.
-MW
Reply by ●May 1, 20052005-05-01
"Mikal" <accclass101@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:1114797544.492923.101050@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...> Dang it. I wrote this whole paragraph on my application, and then lost > it! DANG... > O.K... to summerize (with spelling errors), > My block diagram is as follows > > 25 MHz serial data -> symbol formater(fpga) -> PHY ->analog front > end/TX 0>---(open air)---> then in reverse. > What I'm at the learning curve of is... the PHY. How to format the > I&Q for the PHY. Becuase it's only 4 bits(for a total possibility of 16 > patters)... would that mean that "I" (DAC) get 2 bits, and Q (DAC) gets > 2 bits? And, I can't find a whole lot on how the PHY on the recieving > end either determines where to sample the analog and at what point. > > -MW >Well if you do decide to go with 16QAM http://www.palgrave.com/science/engineering/otung/pdfs/07_49.pdf#search='4%20level%20gray%20code' might help with some of the vocabulary. Best of Luck - Mike






