Hi, I'm looking for someone familiar with the Singer acceleration model. Could such a person explain to me why Singer makes no assumption on the sampling rate and the nyquist theorem? How can he say things such as the correlation coefficient goes to infinity, when it is actually bounded by 1/2T where T is the sampling period? This is driving me bananas!! thnaks This message was sent using the Comp.DSP web interface on www.DSPRelated.com
Singer Acceleration Model and Kalman
Started by ●June 30, 2005
Reply by ●June 30, 20052005-06-30
nicosd wrote:> Hi, > > I'm looking for someone familiar with the Singer acceleration model. > Could such a person explain to me why Singer makes no assumption on the > sampling rate and the nyquist theorem? How can he say things such as the > correlation coefficient goes to infinity, when it is actually bounded by > 1/2T where T is the sampling period? This is driving me bananas!! > > thnaksIt's just a maneuver model proposed by Singer, no more, no less. You could assume acceleration is an uncorrelated, white noise process also. OUP