great....my email-address is donniebrasco9 AT hotmail.com thanks.. -------- "naebad" <minnaebad@yahoo.co.uk> skrev i en meddelelse news:1131650230.976145.309610@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...> Hi, > > I am sorry that I am not an ICA person but i have seen a demo where C1 > and C2 are constants and it worked perfectly using ICA. If you leave > your email I will put you in touch with the Prof that did this. > Different story when C1 and C2 were time-varying z-transfer functions > though. My own experience is with beamforming and I get about 12 dB > reduction in 'noise' (noise being the unwanted speech) using 2 mics in > a real reverberent environment. I am publishing this next year at a > conference. I cannot separate the two but I am only interested in the > signal - not the 'noise'. The only time when you might consider C1 and > C2 to be constants are when you are in an anechoic chamber - and even > then they would be pure delays. In a reverberant environment they would > be non-min phase transfer functions + pure time-delays. > > Naebad >
Question about source separation
Started by ●November 9, 2005
Reply by ●November 10, 20052005-11-10
Reply by ●November 10, 20052005-11-10
Hi again... You do realize that I am looking for an algorithm that can extract an estimate of the 2 unknown sources based on _only_ 1 observation ?? Thanks... ------------------>using 2 mics in > a real reverberent environment. I am publishing this next year at a
Reply by ●November 10, 20052005-11-10
Hi, I said in an earlier post on this thread that if you have only one sensor then forget it! There have been attempts at this but I would not hold out much hope. Naebad
Reply by ●November 11, 20052005-11-11
> Hi, I said in an earlier post on this thread that if you have > only one sensor then forget it!He did say that the two signals are correlated, ie. you have Y(t)=a*S1(t)+b*S2(t), where S1 and S2 are correlated. For example, if S1 = f(S2), with f injective, then I think one can give a pretty good estimate on S1 given only Y. The quality of the estimation depends on how strongly the two signals are correlated. Regards, Andor
Reply by ●November 11, 20052005-11-11
so how do I solve that problem? Any litterature I should read? It would be great with a matlab script that solves this particular kind of problem... ----------> only Y. The quality of the estimation depends on how strongly the two > signals are correlated. > > Regards, > Andor >
Reply by ●November 11, 20052005-11-11
"Lars Hansen" <jojo@yahpoo.com> wrote in message news:43747a50$0$78280$157c6196@dreader1.cybercity.dk...> so how do I solve that problem? Any litterature I should read? It would be > great with a matlab script that solves this particular kind of problem... > > > ---------- > > only Y. The quality of the estimation depends on how strongly the two > > signals are correlated. > > > > Regards, > > Andor > > > >I doubt you will be able to solve this. McC






