DSPRelated.com
Forums

OT: Where did you get your start?

Started by Chris.Gammell January 13, 2006
"Chris.Gammell" wrote:
> I was just wondering how everybody got their start in DSP.
I started out using ADSP-21xx chips as fast microcontrollers in telecom applications, mainly because their serial ports interfaced more or less directly with our serial backplane. Some of our interfaces handled digital data, some voice and some high-quality audio. We eventually started putting more and more of the audio signal processing and timing management into the DSP firmware. -- Dave Tweed

Gary Sokolich wrote:
> In fact, you are so technically > inept that not too long ago you had to go begging in sci.physics for > someone to lead you hand in solving a simple second-order partial > differential equation that is discussed in virtually every introductory > textbook on acoustics.
Moron. It was a *non-linear* differential equation and it derived from _my_ analysis of the problem. (If you can show priority on that analysis please do so.) Where else do you think the distortion components could have come from? If you didn't understand that when you saw it you don't have any business talking about it. You never did understand a thing about the problem.
> Worse yet, you were ultimately told by Zigoteau, > your hand-holder in sci.physics, that you really had no idea what you were > doing.
You got that much right. I had no idea how to find a solution to that equation and needed help. Zigoteau immediately saw the correct formulation and the expansion required for an approximate solution and couldn't understand why I didn't. Ah, well. It must be cool to be like Gary Sokolich and never, ever need help with anything. It must not be cool, though, to have such a mortal fear of being wrong that it prevents you from ever offering any help or any technical substance to a discussion either. BTW, Gary, have you seen this: "Whoever...utilizes any device or software that can be used to originate telecommunications or other types of communications that are transmitted, in whole or in part, by the Internet... without disclosing his identity and with intent to annoy, abuse, threaten, or harass any person...who receives the communications...shall be fined under title 18 or imprisoned not more than two years, or both." From H.R.3402 signed into federal law 1/5/2006 Bob -- "Things should be described as simply as possible, but no simpler." A. Einstein
Jerry Avins wrote:

> I'd like to say "Now I are one," [...]
That expression looks weird to a non-native speaker. What does it mean? Martin -- Quidquid latine scriptum sit, altum viditur.
Martin Eisenberg wrote:
> Jerry Avins wrote: > > >>I'd like to say "Now I are one," [...] > > > That expression looks weird to a non-native speaker. What does it > mean?
There was a wry slogan, sometimes seen on a tee shirt: "Fore years ago, I cudn't even spell 'ingeneer'; now I are one." It was a parody of liberal arts types thinking that technical == stupid. I'm pleased to see that nerds are now in style. Somewhere, I wrote about the psych major from Brooklyn College whose thesis was that people went into engineering because they couldn't hack Shakespeare and Kant, and asked me, as President of our Tau Beta Pi chapter, to help her with her study. She changed her tune when she got the results. Jerry -- Engineering is the art of making what you want from things you can get. �����������������������������������������������������������������������
Martin Eisenberg wrote:

> Jerry Avins wrote: > > >>I'd like to say "Now I are one," [...] > > > That expression looks weird to a non-native speaker. What does it > mean? > > > Martin >
It means he has a long memory for bad jokes. The complete quotation, as I heard it as a freshman engineering student in 1961, was "I used to couldn't spell enginuur, now I are one". [Grammar and spelling errors part of quote.]
Richard Owlett wrote:

> ... "I used to couldn't spell enginuur, now I are one".
OK. Have it your way. :-) Jerry -- Engineering is the art of making what you want from things you can get. �����������������������������������������������������������������������
On Fri, 13 Jan 2006 10:31:39 -0600, "Chris.Gammell" <cjg11@case.edu>
wrote:

>Hey all, > >I was just wondering how everybody got their start in DSP. I am personally >geting mine by working with FPGAs and Simulink tools. Also, I am working my >way into hand coding DSP chips (hence the reason I'm here!). Anyway, just >wondering, as I think it's interesting to know where people came from and >such. I hope to especially hear from the *ahem* experienced (prominent, >older, whatever) members. Thanks! > >Chris
I had the good fortune of graduating from college during the Reagan years when jobs were plentiful. All I was interested in at the time was getting to do some interesting digital design work, and wound up at Goodyear Aerospace helping to design gate-level implementations of synthetic aperture radar processing algorithms. It was an ideal first job for me and I loved it. I hadn't been especially interested in signal processing until then, I'd even thought it was a bit too esoteric for my taste, but I really enjoyed it. Like some other folks here, I've not spent much of my career working with programmable DSP chips, although I have done some of that. Most of it has been either research, systems work, or RTL design to twiddle bits in useful ways. Can't complain too much, I guess. ;) Eric Jacobsen Minister of Algorithms, Intel Corp. My opinions may not be Intel's opinions. http://www.ericjacobsen.org
Richard Owlett wrote:

> Martin Eisenberg wrote: > >> Jerry Avins wrote: >> >>>I'd like to say "Now I are one," [...] >> >> That expression looks weird to a non-native speaker. What does >> it mean? > > It means he has a long memory for bad jokes.
Well, Jerry's got a long memory, and those things we least desire to carry around have a way of sticking best...
> The complete quotation, as I heard it as a freshman engineering > student in 1961, was "I used to couldn't spell enginuur, now I > are one". [Grammar and spelling errors part of quote.]
Thanks, you two! Martin -- Quidquid latine scriptum sit, altum viditur.
Chris.Gammell wrote:
> Hey all, > > I was just wondering how everybody got their start in DSP. I am personally > geting mine by working with FPGAs and Simulink tools. Also, I am working my > way into hand coding DSP chips (hence the reason I'm here!). Anyway, just > wondering, as I think it's interesting to know where people came from and > such. I hope to especially hear from the *ahem* experienced (prominent, > older, whatever) members. Thanks!
If you include "noisy" on the list, I might qualify to answer...? My working carreer started with a summer vacancy at a metal factory when I was 18. My job was to monitor and run the furnaces, and we had basically a computer that plotted various measurements to help us find out the state of the furnace. So my first job was applied data analysis and interpretation. I learned very early on the hazards of getting things wrong. On one occation I was -- literally -- a mere 50 cm from burning to death, a situation I got myself into because we were not able to see or interpret some very subtle clues in the measurements, that just MIGHT have warned us, had we seen them. Or maybe not. Then I went to college, starting out in a computer science class. The first year was spent learning the basics of electrical engineering and digital computers, the second was spent learning the internal workings on the 8086/80286 (and corresponding maths processors) microprocessors. By the start of the third year, the 386 was released and I found it ridiculous to spend six months learning a new microprocessor, only to have to do it again a year later. So I started to see what the computer could be used for. Hence, I discovered DSP. After that, I went to university and so on, focusing on applied DSP, and later on DSP applied to acoustics and seismics. As for me, the focus has always been on the application. Somebody have a task they want to get done, and there is a risk as well as a cost, associated with attempting to get the job done. I have always focused on getting the job done while minimizing the cost AND the risk, which is a bit odd amongst the people I have worked with. A lot of other people (most?) don't think the risk is a lot to worry about, but that almost-burned incident very early on may have "twisted" my mind in that respect. Rune
Chris.Gammell wrote:
> Hey all, > > I was just wondering how everybody got their start in DSP. I am personally > geting mine by working with FPGAs and Simulink tools. Also, I am working my > way into hand coding DSP chips (hence the reason I'm here!). Anyway, just > wondering, as I think it's interesting to know where people came from and > such. I hope to especially hear from the *ahem* experienced (prominent, > older, whatever) members. Thanks! > > Chris
Well, since everybody else is dusting off their old stories, mine combines this thread and "Now I are wun"... Working as a computer tech at NASA Bermuda (tough duty) in the late '60s, I learned to program the RCA 4101 computer used to compute antenna pointing information from NORAD Orbital Elements and wound up being reassigned to Goddard Space Flight Center to take over the programming at the 3 NASA sites where these were installed: Bermuda, Tanarive, Madagascar, and Carnarvon, Australia. Some scientist wallahs from NRL were trying to identify interstellar water vapor sources to be used for a proposed passive submarine navigation system. The 9-meter dish of the radar had a very high surface smoothness and the location at Carnarvon made an excellent site for the examination of the Southern Hemisphere sky for such sources so I was requested to write a sidereal tracking program for the antennas, which took about 3 months. The first test of the system was scheduled for Bermuda and I was sent down to support them. The radar crew installed the NRL horn and receiver at the focal point of the antenna and ran cable the signal cable down to the slip rings (Az/El mount). The NRL folks hooked the other end of the signal cable to an integrating strip recorder. I pointed the antenna at the RA / DEC position of a known source and we sat down to drink coffee and wait while the pen plotted a series of flat lines on yards of paper until finally a bump started to appear and became, over time, a bell-shaped curve of the averaged signal of the source. After 2 hours of looking at the recorder, I asked the NRL guys what could be done to detect the presence of a desired signal more quickly and they said that integrating the RMS of the signal would speed the process up significantly. It occurred to me that the 4101 also collected receiver signal strength from the radar receiver via 12-bit A/D converters, of which it had several to spare (at a rack apiece) so I asked them how one would mathematically do an RMS (duh). By the end of the night I had coded, in assembly language, a program that computed the RMS of a 12-bit A/D value and output the result via D/A to our radar strip-chart recorder. The next day, as the NRL folks slept, we connected the output of their receiver to a spare A/D and the second night night we spent 10 minutes detecting a source that had taken us about an hour to spot the previous night. That was in 1970. My first hands-on with a DSP chip was the AD-21062 in 2000 doing high-precision laser ranging using the BittWare library. Regards, Ken Asbury