DSPRelated.com
Forums

Sound localisation

Started by And Blah Blah Blah February 1, 2006

robert bristow-johnson wrote:

>> Many people with all sorts of pinnae have listened to what mine have >> done to impinging sound of considerable variety without once saying that >> it doesn't sound right. The universal reaction the first time is >> astonishment at the reality of the experience.
I should add here that in two cases, the listener happened to be sitting next to me in the club as I did the recording. They both felt that their original live listening experience had been very well captured.
> yeah, i can believe that. are there finally a published standardized set of > HRTFs (and IAD) that can well be used for sound navigating music or movie > sound? this would be a published set of frequency response curves (both > magnitude and phase, i s'pose) as a function of different zenith and azimuth > angles of the source.
I'm not up on this any more but as of a few years ago there weren't any that were particularly useful but it looked like some would be emerging from work that was in progress. There is a set by Bill Gardner with comprehensive coverage of the spatial angles but the problem is that, for whatever reason, they just don't sound good at all. I think they were measured in anechoic conditions and while that might be useful for research purposes it isn't going to impart any realism.
> also, how sensitive is this from deviation from > sitting in the "sweet spot"?
The sweet spot has to be attached to your head, i.e. 'phones, with canal 'phones (IED's) being the best. I've found the Sony ER71LP, a consumer IED, at under $70 to be very effective. There has been some work done with a pair of speakers and crosstalk cancellation and I can't speak to its efficacy but the sweet spot would be a point and not a volume. This would also suffer from a double pinnae effect in the case of binaural unless the setup compensated for the HRTF of the listener at that sweet spot. Bob -- "Things should be described as simply as possible, but no simpler." A. Einstein