estimation of autocorrelation matrix or eigenvalue spread.

Randy Yates wrote:
> "Andor" <andor.bariska@gmail.com> writes:
> 
>> Arul wrote:
>>> Hello everybody,
>>>
>>>                            I am currently intented to work on Seismic
>>> signals. iam new to seismic signals though have some exposure to
>>> Digital signal processing.
>>>                          iam awaiting suggestion
>> I suggest you ask a question.
> 
> Oh, come now, Andor - you're too intolerant and demanding. Don't you
> know this is the new Information Age, where any anonymous, insolent
> person must only hint at a question and the whole world will clammer
> to answer it?

Poor Arul probably spent half a day with dictionary in hand to compose 
even that much of a message. It's fine -- because it's true -- to tell 
him that it isn't good enough, but let's not grind him down for it.

Jerry
-- 
Engineering is the art of making what you want from things you can get.
&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;

Arul wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
>                            I am currently intented to work on Seismic
> signals. iam new to seismic signals though have some exposure to
> Digital signal processing.
>                          iam awaiting suggestion

If you want to approach seismic from a DSP point of view, the only
overview/tutorial I know of, is a special issue of Proceedings of the
IEEE, I think it was october 1984.

True, the articles are dated, but they were written by the people who
introduced seismics to DSP; Treitel, Robinson, maybe even Burg.
The Proc. IEEE spesial issue seems to have been aimed at making
the DSP community, which is primarily interested in telecommunication
and radars, interested in seismics as well. Don't know how well it
worked, though.

You ought to be a bit careful about using seismic literature to
understand how DSP ties in. My impression is that "seimicians"
treat DSP more or less as a "black box" that does a job, but no
one seem to know, or even to be interested in knowing, how and
why DSP works.

Rune

hello everybody,
                        Rune thanks for your Direction, I too Welcome
all other's comments. Here after i will try to be More specific in
topic before posting a query.

                              Will be back soon

Thanks For your time and consideration

Arul


Rune Allnor wrote:

> If you want to approach seismic from a DSP point of view, the only
> overview/tutorial I know of, is a special issue of Proceedings of the
> IEEE, I think it was october 1984.
>
> True, the articles are dated, but they were written by the people who
> introduced seismics to DSP; Treitel, Robinson, maybe even Burg.
> The Proc. IEEE spesial issue seems to have been aimed at making
> the DSP community, which is primarily interested in telecommunication
> and radars, interested in seismics as well. Don't know how well it
> worked, though.
>
> You ought to be a bit careful about using seismic literature to
> understand how DSP ties in. My impression is that "seimicians"
> treat DSP more or less as a "black box" that does a job, but no
> one seem to know, or even to be interested in knowing, how and
> why DSP works.
> 
> Rune