Brian Reay!!!!! You've gone very quiet all of a sudden!!!!!

You keep sneering about this "Big K" on the assumption,
or even a declared desperate wish on your part, that I'm
wound up by it.

I'm afraid that you are mistaken, but continue to make
yourself appear to be a somewhat immature silly fool
on the issue. I'm quite willing to challenge you
on your infantility for as long as you wish to keep it up.

I've always been keen on technical matters and in
learning thereof, and have never had any difficulty
in admitting my own misunderstandings. (You're going
to have a hard time as a teacher, BTW, if you sneer
at those who are quite open about ignorance and
their willingness to be taught)

You're obssessed with "Big K", but seem incapable of
discussing the technical issues.

OK, let me help you

Many texts and websites associated with DSP try to claim
that the action of sampling is represented by the multiplication
of the incoming waveform by a Shah function. Now, although
the Dirac Delta Function is a very useful analytic tool once
a network has been reduced to a mathematical equation, it is
far from respectable to claim that such Delta Functions
feature in the circuits used for sampling because no pulses
of heights approaching infinity or of areas approaching unity,
appear anywhere in the sampling circuitry.

Therefore I suggested that some other scaling factor must
be employed, that I dubbed "Big K". You, Brian, have sneered
about this vacuously for some years now, but have been
incapable of explaining why you sneer despite your _BOAST_
of having _TWO_ degrees, one in mathematics and the other
in electronics. That alone is a sad condemnation of the standards
of teachers in Strood, Kent, Britland. Perhaps you should lay off the
whiskey that you keep discussing on Usenet?

I have since discovered, by an embarrassingly simple explanation
that the proposal of "Big K" was technically sound. "Big K" is no
more than the sampling interval, normally shown as "T".

Buttocks-Johnstone (or some such similar name, sorry don't
recall what it is) in his treatment of sampling stated quite clearly
that this T factor was necessary (in order to make the reconstruction
maths work out) but even he couldn't explain where it came from,
and to state that a factor is necessary to make the answer come
out correct is a piss-poor demonstration of technical acumen.

The various text books and websites that discuss sampling continue
to omit this crucial factor of T, so, if you were trying to resolve
this difficulty, as I was, you repeatedly came up against the
nonosensical assertion that sampling was the multiplication
of an input waveform but Shah function.

Brian - you claimed that the answer was given to me quite
early on in my Usenet enquiries, but I've notfound such an
explanation of the derivation .....perhaps you could now
quote this answer?

on 30/03/2007 08:42 G.A.Evans, village idiot spouted a load of crap 
which has Bean snipped.

Get a job, Evans
...(_!_)...

Has someone rattled Garths cage again? 

I can best deal with the Childish Broadcast (CB) of
the rather silly and infantile child below by re-iterating one of
 the threads of the past few days....

"On a daily basis, this NG is a forum seemingly
for escapees from the school playground, with
gratuitous and offensive personal remarks
originating from even those who have not
been part of a conversation and who could have
no reason, other than uncontrolled infantile
emotions, for interjecting as they do.

Is such public and international demonstrations really
the way forward; the way for PR for the future
of Ham Radio. I say, "No!".

I cannot see how something that is a technical pursuit
with traditions of gentlemanly behaviour could
possibly give way to the childish sneering that is
typical of this NG."

"Dirntknow" <nospam@please.com> wrote in message 
news:ye7Ph.39216$Lz4.15218@newsfe7-gui.ntli.net...
> Has someone rattled Garths cage again?
> 

"Dirntknow" <nospam@please.com> wrote in message 
news:ye7Ph.39216$Lz4.15218@newsfe7-gui.ntli.net...
> Has someone rattled Garths cage again?

Well, he does seem just a tad wound up- and all this over a tip to find some 
vitamin B1! It makes you wonder about trying to help people.

Anyway, it has been a busy day and I'm off to the radio club tonight and the 
holiday has begun!

-- 
73
Brian, G8OSN
www.g8osn.org.uk

 

"G.A.Evans G4SDW" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message 
news:euif0p$lkf$1@news.datemas.de...

I really have better things to do than educate you- esp. as you fall below 
the standards of maths I'd expect to have bother with- not to mention 
manners and attitude.

Brian

"Brian Reay" <see@website.invalid> wrote in message 
news:idbPh.20166$7l1.4056@newsfe4-gui.ntli.net...
> "G.A.Evans G4SDW" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message 
> news:euif0p$lkf$1@news.datemas.de...
>
> I really have better things to do than educate you- esp. as you fall below 
> the standards of maths I'd expect to have bother with- not to mention 
> manners and attitude.

However Garth, here is the post where I explain that the 1/T  you tied to 
your Big K was yet another error.

http://groups.google.co.uk/group/uk.radio.amateur/msg/17a6175c5556ad06?hl=en&

Enjoy your weeked, I certainly will.

Brian 

There it is again, your desperate wish to
be winding me up.

Not very grown up of you, OM.

"Brian Reay" <see@website.invalid> wrote in message 
news:z7bPh.20129$7l1.17962@newsfe4-gui.ntli.net...
> "Dirntknow" <nospam@please.com> wrote in message 
> news:ye7Ph.39216$Lz4.15218@newsfe7-gui.ntli.net...
>> Has someone rattled Garths cage again?
>
> Well, he does seem just a tad wound up- and all this over a tip to find 
> some vitamin B1! It makes you wonder about trying to help people.
>
> Anyway, it has been a busy day and I'm off to the radio club tonight and 
> the holiday has begun!
>
> -- 
> 73
> Brian, G8OSN
> www.g8osn.org.uk
>
>
>
> 

So you don't know the answer which explains why you
resort to sneering on the sidelines from your school playground?

What standard of mathematics are you suggesting that I have,
and where is your evidence for supporting what is in reality
yet another infantile jibe?

As to manners and attitude, I'm merely asserting the right off
reply to you. (See below for example of manners and attitude)

"Brian Reay" <see@website.invalid> wrote in message 
news:idbPh.20166$7l1.4056@newsfe4-gui.ntli.net...
> "G.A.Evans G4SDW" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message 
> news:euif0p$lkf$1@news.datemas.de...
>
> I really have better things to do than educate you- esp. as you fall below 
> the standards of maths I'd expect to have bother with- not to mention 
> manners and attitude.
>
> Brian
>
>

MANNERS AND ATTITUDE.....


Your habitual references to bestiality with sheep, grossly offensive 
references
to alcohol, and a few other infantile outbursts from you.....

-----OOOOO-----
From: "Brian Reay" <brian.r...@bigfoot.com>
Newsgroups: uk.radio.amateur
Subject: Re: Santa's on his way!!!
Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2003 23:13:08 -0000
 "Frank Turner-Smith G3VKI" <g...@turner-smith.co.uk> wrote in message
news:bsd5v2$c4acr$1@ID-201868.news.uni-berlin.de...
> http://www.noradsanta.org/english/radar/index.html
> He's on his way. Isn't it exciting? I wonder what he's bringing for
> Chippenham residents.


Dunno, but I heard the reindeer won't be wearing their woolly jumpers
this
year.
Brian

-----OOOOO-----
From: "Brian Reay" <brian.r...@bigfoot.com>
Newsgroups: uk.radio.amateur
Subject: Re: Phase noise
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 00:08:22 -0000
Nah----- Gareth has his own way of doing this- a special (brew?) form
of
complex algebra that uses negative indices to reverse time ;-)
 73
Brian

-----OOOOO-----
From: "Brian Reay" <brian.r...@bigfoot.com>
Newsgroups: uk.radio.amateur
Subject: Re: NEED MONEY FOR?
Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2003 00:41:19 +0100
If you must play silly games remember that not all of us have killed
off our
brain cells with Special Brew.

-----OOOOO-----
From: "Brian Reay" <brian.r...@bigfoot.com>
Newsgroups: uk.radio.amateur
Subject: Re: "Simple" definition of impedence
Date: Thu, 22 May 2003 20:01:13 +0100
A knighthood, no a peerage, next-  Lord Evans of Chippenham. Coat of
arms
will feature sheep, of course, and a sheep fleece will replace the
normal
Erime on the robes.
For the Evans Theory, will cold Carlsberg replace the 'really hot cup
of
tea'? (ref  'Hitch Hikers Guide", the bit about the chap who invented
the
"Infinite Improbability Drive").
73
Brian

-----OOOOO-----
From: "Brian Reay" <brian.r...@bigfoot.com>
Newsgroups: uk.radio.amateur
Subject: Re: Rally List May/June.
Date: Thu, 22 May 2003 21:06:30 +0100
What are  the sheep worried about?
Interest rates? The Euro? Price of petrol? Or the Evans Theory of Life
the
Universe and Everything?
73
Brian

-----OOOOO-----
From: "Brian Reay" <brian.r...@bigfoot.com>
Newsgroups: uk.radio.amateur
Subject: Re: Christmas entertainment.
Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2003 22:06:25 -0000
I can imagine there are whole flocks of sheep in Chippenham that would
like
to be left in peace to watch some TV- even Chris Tarrant ;-)
73
Brian

-----OOOOO-----
From: "Brian Reay" <brian.r...@bigfoot.com>
Newsgroups: uk.radio.amateur
Subject: Re: Merry Christmas
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 18:12:02 -0000
I suspect Gareth would welcome a boring life. Even a boring life must
be
better than no life - waking up each day with bitter negative thoughts
and
only a sheep next to you.
Could make you turn  to drink
He has children?  That is a depressing thought. Poor little s**s.  I
bet
their maths homework was always wrong ;-)
Is there a 'sad lonely old git'  group in Chippenham?

-----OOOOO-----
From: "Brian Reay" <brian.r...@bigfoot.com>
Newsgroups: uk.radio.amateur
Subject: Re: UK Power limit on FM?????????? whats the calc?
Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2003 11:58:00 +0100
As regards the University, I'm sure even Essex wasn't that bad when
Gareth
claims he was there. Maybe he just didn't pay attention or understand
;-)
You know how some students react to being let off the lead when they
get to
University- too much booze and women etc. I  assume  booze and sheep
have
the same effect ;-) Of course, most people grow out of it.
 73
Brian

-----OOOOO-----
From: "Brian Reay" <brian.r...@bigfoot.com>
Newsgroups:
uk.community.policing,alt.radio.scanner.uk,uk.community.firefighting,nl.rad=
=ADi
o=2Escanners,uk.radio.amateur
Subject: Re: North Wales Police could bypass Tetra
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 21:50:17 -0000
 "Mefix" <m...@home.scotland> wrote in message
news:b5ntlg$ci8$1@hercules.btinternet.com...

> I think that that comment could be construed as being libellous, Mr.


Evans.
If they were sheep, do you think he would like them?
73
Brian

-----OOOOO-----
From: "Brian Reay" <brian.r...@bigfoot.com>
Newsgroups: uk.radio.amateur
Subject: Re: Libel Actions
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2003 19:32:02 -0000
 <luci...@eternal-flames.gov> wrote in message
news:qkop6vkmmbbu5fg3b6qu85sbts7sh7isi5@4ax.com...
> No.  You cannot libel (or slander) a group such as this.  You can only
> libel (or slander) an individual or in some specific cases an entity.
So we are OK with groups that:
Live in Chippenham, drink Carlsberg and/or Meths,  'know'  sheep, etc
etc.
73
Brian

-----OOOOO-----

Sorry, but that doesn't explain it at all and just
looks like bullshittobollocks (a common M3OSNism)

For example, in your desperation to cause insult, you claim that
I confused period and width, but I certainly never did,
and there is no evidence in what you cite to support
such a slur.

You're not asserting anything at all other than to
argue a point that Briston-Johnsowe had made, and from
which I had derived, but not something that I was asserting per se.

As to "manners and attitude", a contemporaneous comment from
you in another post in this thread, your gratuitous persoanl remarks
in the article cited make it looks once again as though
your mantra is, "Do as I say and not as I do"

So, it still remains that you sneer in a vacuous childish manner about
"Big K" and remain incapable of explaining why it is that you
are sneering despite _BOASTING_ of _TWO_ degrees,
one in mathematics and the other in electronics. Not a very
good advertisement for the standard of mathematics teaching
in Strood, Kent, is it?

"Brian Reay" <see@website.invalid> wrote in message 
news:OobPh.5701$j_2.4933@newsfe3-gui.ntli.net...
>
> "Brian Reay" <see@website.invalid> wrote in message 
> news:idbPh.20166$7l1.4056@newsfe4-gui.ntli.net...
>> "G.A.Evans G4SDW" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message 
>> news:euif0p$lkf$1@news.datemas.de...
>>
>> I really have better things to do than educate you- esp. as you fall 
>> below the standards of maths I'd expect to have bother with- not to 
>> mention manners and attitude.
>
> However Garth, here is the post where I explain that the 1/T  you tied to 
> your Big K was yet another error.
>
> http://groups.google.co.uk/group/uk.radio.amateur/msg/17a6175c5556ad06?hl=en&
>
> Enjoy your weeked, I certainly will.
>
> Brian
>