DSPRelated.com
Forums

A new UK MOD helmet for pilots

Started by HardySpicer November 10, 2007
http://www.mod.uk/NR/rdonlyres/9E5ACBA4-452E-4A09-BDE7-94729D1CB17B/0/20071108_Testhelmet_600x400.JPG

or

http://tinyurl.com/2dt4bu


It's Weird.

Hardy

On Sat, 10 Nov 2007 11:46:59 -0800, in sci.electronics.design
HardySpicer <gyansorova@gmail.com> wrote:

>http://www.mod.uk/NR/rdonlyres/9E5ACBA4-452E-4A09-BDE7-94729D1CB17B/0/20071108_Testhelmet_600x400.JPG > >or > >http://tinyurl.com/2dt4bu > > >It's Weird. > >Hardy
http://pizdaus.com/pics/AJVJnnJTyqbx.jpg Martin
On Sat, 10 Nov 2007 11:46:59 -0800, HardySpicer <gyansorova@gmail.com>
wrote:

>http://www.mod.uk/NR/rdonlyres/9E5ACBA4-452E-4A09-BDE7-94729D1CB17B/0/20071108_Testhelmet_600x400.JPG > >or > >http://tinyurl.com/2dt4bu > > >It's Weird. >
Are you sure isn't some MP's gimp mask that has been delivered to the wrong building in Whitehall ?
HardySpicer wrote:
> http://www.mod.uk/NR/rdonlyres/9E5ACBA4-452E-4A09-BDE7-94729D1CB17B/0/20071108_Testhelmet_600x400.JPG > > or > > http://tinyurl.com/2dt4bu > > > It's Weird. > > Hardy >
In what way is it weird? These types of equipment are made only to be functional. Not to be pretty. I guess those lumps on the top contain motors for head up display control. Why smooth them into the design when it adds nothing? All that's needed is to avoid sharp bits that could snag something, which they have done. Steve
On Sun, 11 Nov 2007 09:51:33 +0800, Steve Underwood <steveu@dis.org>
wrote:

>HardySpicer wrote: >> http://www.mod.uk/NR/rdonlyres/9E5ACBA4-452E-4A09-BDE7-94729D1CB17B/0/20071108_Testhelmet_600x400.JPG >> >> or >> >> http://tinyurl.com/2dt4bu >> >> >> It's Weird. >> >> Hardy >> >In what way is it weird? These types of equipment are made only to be >functional. Not to be pretty. I guess those lumps on the top contain >motors for head up display control.
No. Those ARE the HUD devices. There are no motors, and if there were, they wouldn't need to be that big.
> Why smooth them into the design when > it adds nothing? All that's needed is to avoid sharp bits that could >snag something, which they have done.
I think they look pretty advanced.
ChairmanOfTheBored <RUBored@crackasmile.org> writes:

> On Sun, 11 Nov 2007 09:51:33 +0800, Steve Underwood <steveu@dis.org> > wrote: > >>HardySpicer wrote: >>> http://www.mod.uk/NR/rdonlyres/9E5ACBA4-452E-4A09-BDE7-94729D1CB17B/0/20071108_Testhelmet_600x400.JPG >>> >>> or >>> >>> http://tinyurl.com/2dt4bu >>> >>> >>> It's Weird. >>> >>> Hardy >>> >>In what way is it weird? These types of equipment are made only to be >>functional. Not to be pretty. I guess those lumps on the top contain >>motors for head up display control. > > No. Those ARE the HUD devices. There are no motors, and if there > were, they wouldn't need to be that big. > >> Why smooth them into the design when >> it adds nothing? All that's needed is to avoid sharp bits that could >>snag something, which they have done. > > I think they look pretty advanced.
I'd love to have one for Halloween... -- % Randy Yates % "...the answer lies within your soul %% Fuquay-Varina, NC % 'cause no one knows which side %%% 919-577-9882 % the coin will fall." %%%% <yates@ieee.org> % 'Big Wheels', *Out of the Blue*, ELO http://www.digitalsignallabs.com
On Nov 11, 2:51 pm, Steve Underwood <ste...@dis.org> wrote:
> HardySpicer wrote: > >http://www.mod.uk/NR/rdonlyres/9E5ACBA4-452E-4A09-BDE7-94729D1CB17B/0... > > > or > > >http://tinyurl.com/2dt4bu > > > It's Weird. > > > Hardy > > In what way is it weird?
Autism is still prevailant in some NGs I see!
Randy Yates wrote:
> ChairmanOfTheBored <RUBored@crackasmile.org> writes: > >> On Sun, 11 Nov 2007 09:51:33 +0800, Steve Underwood <steveu@dis.org> >> wrote: >> >>> HardySpicer wrote: >>>> http://www.mod.uk/NR/rdonlyres/9E5ACBA4-452E-4A09-BDE7-94729D1CB17B/0/20071108_Testhelmet_600x400.JPG >>>> >>>> or >>>> >>>> http://tinyurl.com/2dt4bu >>>> >>>> >>>> It's Weird. >>>> >>>> Hardy >>>> >>> In what way is it weird? These types of equipment are made only to be >>> functional. Not to be pretty. I guess those lumps on the top contain >>> motors for head up display control. >> No. Those ARE the HUD devices. There are no motors, and if there >> were, they wouldn't need to be that big. >> >>> Why smooth them into the design when >>> it adds nothing? All that's needed is to avoid sharp bits that could >>> snag something, which they have done. >> I think they look pretty advanced. > > I'd love to have one for Halloween...
All we need to add to it is a ram-jet personal helicopter making fiery exhaust circles And we have Ezekiel's dog-faced man and wheels within wheels. Aliens-R-Us! Jerry -- Engineering is the art of making what you want from things you can get. &#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;
ChairmanOfTheBored <RUBored@crackasmile.org> hath wroth:

> No. Those ARE the HUD devices. There are no motors, and if there >were, they wouldn't need to be that big.
According to the accompanying article at: <http://www.mod.uk/DefenceInternet/DefenceNews/EquipmentAndLogistics/NewCombatHelmetIsAVisionOfTheFuture.htm> the instruments are projected directly onto the pilots visor. It's also listed as a "developmental" helmet, which means the aesthetics committee has yet to provide their input and modifications. -- Jeff Liebermann jeffl@cruzio.com 150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558
On a sunny day (Sat, 10 Nov 2007 21:38:47 -0500) it happened Randy Yates
<yates@ieee.org> wrote in <m3hcjtpkug.fsf@ieee.org>:

>ChairmanOfTheBored <RUBored@crackasmile.org> writes: > >> On Sun, 11 Nov 2007 09:51:33 +0800, Steve Underwood <steveu@dis.org> >> wrote: >> >>>HardySpicer wrote: >>>> http://www.mod.uk/NR/rdonlyres/9E5ACBA4-452E-4A09-BDE7-94729D1CB17B/0/20071108_Testhelmet_600x400.JPG >>>> >>>> or >>>> >>>> http://tinyurl.com/2dt4bu >>>> >>>> >>>> It's Weird. >>>> >>>> Hardy >>>> >>>In what way is it weird? These types of equipment are made only to be >>>functional. Not to be pretty. I guess those lumps on the top contain >>>motors for head up display control. >> >> No. Those ARE the HUD devices. There are no motors, and if there >> were, they wouldn't need to be that big. >> >>> Why smooth them into the design when >>> it adds nothing? All that's needed is to avoid sharp bits that could >>>snag something, which they have done. >> >> I think they look pretty advanced. > >I'd love to have one for Halloween...
The green eyes make it look a bit cat like...