Forums

Envelope Detection

Started by stephaneb 4 years ago2 replieslatest reply 4 years ago650 views

@Rick Lyons has just posted a new article in his blog:

Digital Envelope Detection: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly

If you have any comment or question about the article, I suggest that you post it here in this thread. The forum interface is much better than the comments system in the blog (I am working on a new comments system).  

I would also like to invite you to click on the beer button () at the top of Rick's blog if you enjoyed the article.  This is a great way to encourage Rick to write more articles down the line.  Every click on the beer button will award a $2 compensation for Rick's work that will be paid for by our sponsors.


[ - ]
Reply by martinvicanekApril 6, 2016

Thank you for this clear and systematic compilation. I was wondering what the ranking would be for an envelope follower in musical applications like auto-wahwah or compressor. One fundamental difference is that in that case, the "carrier" is a broadband signal (20 Hz to 20 kHz), which seems to rule out synchronous methods? I see two basic requirements: (i) fast response (ii) good attenuation of ripples (else there will be harmonic distorsion, intermodulation etc.). These two seem to be in conflict. Any creative thoughts on that?

[ - ]
Reply by Rick LyonsNovember 19, 2016

Hello martinvicanek. In my limited software experimentation with these various envelope detectors I noticed that different detectors appeared to perform better than other detectors depending on the nature (and noise content) of my test signals. So I'm  reluctant to make a claim of which envelope detection method is the best method to use in any given situation. All I can say is, if you need to implement envelope detection in some application then it's sensible to test several different detection methods on your particular signals to see which method appears to work the best for you.