Search Physical Audio Signal Processing
Book Index | Global Index
Would you like to be notified by email when Julius Orion Smith III publishes a new entry into his blog?
Lossy Vibration
The DW and FDTD state-space models are equivalent with respect to
lossy traveling-wave simulation. Figure P.4 shows the flow diagram
for the case of simple attenuation by
per sample of wave
propagation, where
for a passive string.
Figure P.4:
DW flow diagram in the lossy case.
 |
The DW state update can be written in this case as
where the loss associated with two time steps has been incorporated
into the chosen subgrid for physical accuracy. (The neglected subgrid
may now be considered lossless.) In changing coordinates to the FDTD
scheme, the gain factor

can remain factored out, yielding
When the input is zero after a particular time, such as in a plucked
or
struck string simulation, the losses can be implemented at the
final output, and only when an output is required,
e.g.,
where

denotes the corresponding lossless simulation. When
there is a general input
signal, the state vector needs to be properly
attenuated by losses. In the DW case, the losses can be lumped at two
points per spatial input and output [
458].
Previous:
Interior Scattering JunctionsNext:
State Space Summary
written by Julius Orion Smith III
Julius Smith's background is in electrical engineering (BS Rice 1975, PhD Stanford 1983). He is presently Professor of Music and Associate Professor (by courtesy) of Electrical Engineering at
Stanford's Center for Computer Research in Music and Acoustics (CCRMA), teaching courses and pursuing research related to signal processing applied to music and audio systems. See
http://ccrma.stanford.edu/~jos/ for details.