Simplified Impedance Analysis
The above results are quickly derived from the general
reflection-coefficient for force waves (or voltage waves, pressure
waves, etc.):
 |
(5.22) |
where

is the
reflection coefficient of
impedance 
as
``seen'' from impedance

. In other words, if a wave

traveling along in impedance

suddenly hits a new impedance

, the wave will split into a reflected wave

, and a
transmitted wave

. It therefore follows that a
velocity
wave

will split into a reflected wave

and
transmitted wave

. This rule is derived in
§
H.8.4 (and
implicitly above as well).
In the mass-string-collision problem, we can immediately write down
the force reflectance of the mass as seen from either string:
That is, waves in the string are traveling through
wave impedance

, and when they hit the mass, they are hitting the
series
combination of the mass impedance

and the
wave impedance

of the string on the other side of the mass. Thus, in terms of
Eq.

(
4.22) above,

and

.
The velocity reflectance is simply
, since
The general rule for a force transmission-transfer-function (or
force transmittance) is similarly easily derived:
A similar derivation shows that the velocity transmittance is
also one plus the velocity reflectance:
That is, the transmittance is always one plus the reflectance, and the
reflectance is

for force waves and

for velocity
waves. From the foregoing, we can immediately write down the force
transmittance of a mass on a string:
The velocity transmittance is
For

the transmission
filters become 1, as expected, since there
is no mass on the string after all, and the wave simply
propagates
undisturbed to the other string segment. For

,

while

. The velocity transmittance

makes good
physical sense because an infinite mass is a
rigid termination of the
string. Since the mass cannot be moved, the transmitted velocity must
be zero. The fact that the transmitted force is twice the incoming
force might give one pause; however, it cannot perform work on the
other string, because the transmitted power is given by the force
times the velocity, and the transmitted velocity is zero.
In summary, we have characterized the mass on the string in terms of its
reflectance and transmittance from either string. For force waves, we have
outgoing waves given by
in terms of the incoming waves
and
, the force
reflectance
, and the force transmittance
. We may say that the mass
creates a dynamic scattering junction on the string. (If there
were no dependency on
, such as when a dashpot is affixed to the
string, we would simply call it a scattering junction.) The
above form of the dynamic scattering junction is analogous to the
Kelly-Lochbaum scattering junction (§H.8.4). The general relation
can
be used to simplify the Kelly-Lochbaum form to a one-filter
dynamic scattering junction analogous to the one-multiply scattering
junction (§H.8.5):
The one-filter form follows from the observation that
appears in both computations, and therefore need only be implemented once:
This structure is diagrammed in Fig.4.23.
Figure 4.23:
Continuous-time simulation diagram for
for an ideal string with a point mass attached.
 |
Again, the above results follow immediately from the more general
formulation of §H.10.
Previous:
Mass Termination ModelNext:
Digital Waveguide Model
written by Julius Orion Smith III
Julius Smith's background is in electrical engineering (BS Rice 1975, PhD Stanford 1983). He is presently Professor of Music and Associate Professor (by courtesy) of Electrical Engineering at
Stanford's Center for Computer Research in Music and Acoustics (CCRMA), teaching courses and pursuing research related to signal processing applied to music and audio systems. See
http://ccrma.stanford.edu/~jos/ for details.