### Equation Error Formulation

The*equation error*is defined (in the frequency domain) as

*output error*:

*difference equation*:

*outputs*:

where is the vector of unknown filter coefficients. Then the problem is to minimize this norm with respect to . What makes the equation-error so easy to minimize is that it is

*linear in the parameters*. In the time-domain form, it is clear that the equation error is linear in the unknowns . When the error is linear in the parameters, the sum of squared errors is a

*quadratic form*which can be minimized using one iteration of Newton's method. In other words, minimizing the norm of any error which is linear in the parameters results in a set of linear equations to solve. In the case of the equation-error minimization at hand, we will obtain linear equations in as many unknowns. Note that (I.11) can be expressed as

*weighted output error*in which the frequency weighting function on the unit circle is given by . Thus, the weighting function is determined by the filter

*poles*, and the error is weighted

*less*near the poles. Since the poles of a good filter-design tend toward regions of high spectral energy, or toward ``irregularities'' in the spectrum, it is evident that the equation-error criterion assigns less importance to the most prominent or structured spectral regions. On the other hand, far away from the roots of , good fits to

*both phase and magnitude*can be expected. The weighting effect can be eliminated through use of the

*Steiglitz-McBride algorithm*[45,78] which iteratively solves the weighted equation-error solution, using the canceling weight function from the previous iteration. When it converges (which is typical in practice), it must converge to the output error minimizer.

**Next Section:**

Error Weighting and Frequency Warping

**Previous Section:**

Examples