Digital Upconversion using the baseband data(IQ) files

>On Mon, 25 May 2015 00:54:11 -0700 (PDT), ikram998563@gmail.com wrote:
>
>>Hi all,
>>     i want to upconvert the baseband data (complex data). i have code
for
>upconverting but struggling to implement interpolater (resampler) before
>upconverter and i need to implement a filter after the upconverter. so
can
>any one help me to implement both resampler and filter . Iam trying to
>upconvert a baseband to 70Mhz IF .
>>
>>Thanks in advance.
>
>Hello ikram998563,
>   After reading all the posts in this thread, 
>do you now have the answer to your question?
>
>[-Rick-]

Unfortunately this forum is unique in that every thread is hijacked to
become battleground for all sorts of great ideas, possibilities,
scenarios, clever workarounds ...etc away from understanding really what
the post wanted in the first place and in what setup and background they
are working. If you look at fpga fora you will see spot on short answers
most of the time and contributors do not spoil a good answer just because
they want to prove they know better answer.

Kaz
---------------------------------------
Posted through http://www.DSPRelated.com

On Thu, 28 May 2015 12:36:32 -0500, kaz wrote:

>>On Mon, 25 May 2015 00:54:11 -0700 (PDT), ikram998563@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>>>Hi all,
>>>     i want to upconvert the baseband data (complex data). i have code
> for
>>upconverting but struggling to implement interpolater (resampler) before
>>upconverter and i need to implement a filter after the upconverter. so
> can
>>any one help me to implement both resampler and filter . Iam trying to
>>upconvert a baseband to 70Mhz IF .
>>>
>>>Thanks in advance.
>>
>>Hello ikram998563,
>>   After reading all the posts in this thread,
>>do you now have the answer to your question?
>>
>>[-Rick-]
> 
> Unfortunately this forum is unique in that every thread is hijacked to
> become battleground for all sorts of great ideas, possibilities,
> scenarios, clever workarounds ...etc away from understanding really what
> the post wanted in the first place and in what setup and background they
> are working. If you look at fpga fora you will see spot on short answers
> most of the time and contributors do not spoil a good answer just
> because they want to prove they know better answer.

Hardly unique, and I think we often get the job done.

Sometimes people ask simple questions to which there is no simple answer 
-- then, things get complex.

-- 

Tim Wescott
Wescott Design Services
http://www.wescottdesign.com

On Thu, 28 May 2015 12:36:32 -0500, "kaz" <37480@DSPRelated> wrote:

>>On Mon, 25 May 2015 00:54:11 -0700 (PDT), ikram998563@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>>>Hi all,
>>>     i want to upconvert the baseband data (complex data). i have code
>for
>>upconverting but struggling to implement interpolater (resampler) before
>>upconverter and i need to implement a filter after the upconverter. so
>can
>>any one help me to implement both resampler and filter . Iam trying to
>>upconvert a baseband to 70Mhz IF .
>>>
>>>Thanks in advance.
>>
>>Hello ikram998563,
>>   After reading all the posts in this thread, 
>>do you now have the answer to your question?
>>
>>[-Rick-]
>
>Unfortunately this forum is unique in that every thread is hijacked to
>become battleground for all sorts of great ideas, possibilities,
>scenarios, clever workarounds ...etc away from understanding really what
>the post wanted in the first place and in what setup and background they
>are working. If you look at fpga fora you will see spot on short answers
>most of the time and contributors do not spoil a good answer just because
>they want to prove they know better answer.
>
>Kaz

That seems to be the normal evolution of casual group face-to-face
discussions, too, so I've never thought it was too remarkable.   I do
think it's worthwhile to do something like Rick did, though, and make
sure the OP got what they were after.   Sometimes when you do that the
OP has long since disappeared.   I don't know if that's because they
got what they wanted and left or they got annoyed at the digressions.

This place can be interesting sometimes.   ;)


Eric Jacobsen
Anchor Hill Communications
http://www.anchorhill.com