DSPRelated.com
Forums

I/Q modulation and phase noise sensitivity

Started by Peter Mairhofer July 27, 2015
>> I-imag(hilbert(Q)) > >If I change my code as follows, result get worse by precicely 3dB (but >maybe because I got something wrong before):
I have a theory where the 3dB loss come from. Your method of modulation is DSB-SC (Double Sideband Suppressed Carrier). By using an SSB demodulator, like I suggested, to demodulate the signal, only one sideband is used and so half of the transmitted power is thrown away. That may be the reason for the 3dB loss. I believe the correct way would be to implement a DSB-SC demodulator which is, from what I understand, a bit more complicated. I have never done this but I think it involves finding the original phase of the signal, using a Costas loop for example. When phase-locked, the signal can be extracted from the I-branch and the Q-branch should be 0. That being said, if in your simulations you make sure that the phase noise has an average of 0, the system should behave as if it's phase locked. That would then imply that you can extract the original signal directly from the I-branch and that the Q-branch can be ignored. I think it was something like that you started out with... In a real-world implementation though, you could of course never assume that the DSB-SC signal is magically phase-locked so something like a Costas loop is needed to recover the phase. / Tobias
> >Thanks again! >Peter
--------------------------------------- Posted through http://www.DSPRelated.com
sm0svx <107472@DSPRelated> wrote:

>I have a theory where the 3dB loss come from. Your method of modulation is >DSB-SC (Double Sideband Suppressed Carrier). By using an SSB demodulator, >like I suggested, to demodulate the signal, only one sideband is used and >so half of the transmitted power is thrown away. That may be the reason >for the 3dB loss.
>I believe the correct way would be to implement a DSB-SC demodulator which >is, from what I understand, a bit more complicated.
Why not use both a SSB transmitter and an SSB receiver? Or more complicatedly, a vestigal-sideband system. Steve