Chebyshev and Hamming Windows Compared
Figure 3.34 shows an overlay of Hamming and Dolph-Chebyshev window transforms,
the ripple parameter for chebwin set to 
dB to make it
comparable to the Hamming side-lobe level. We see that the
monotonicity constraint inherent in the Hamming window family only
costs a few dB of deviation from optimality in the Chebyshev sense at
high frequency.
![\begin{psfrags}
% latex2html id marker 9837\psfrag{freq}{$\omega T$\ (radians per sample)}\begin{figure}[htbp]
\includegraphics[width=\twidth]{eps/chebHammingC}
\caption{}
\end{figure}
\end{psfrags}](http://www.dsprelated.com/josimages_new/sasp2/img532.png)
Next Section:
Dolph-Chebyshev Window Theory
Previous Section:
Example Chebyshev Windows and Transforms
