|
Just for those who followed the discussion and are interested in the topic: > > I had been sure that I did enable the warning about > > missing prototypes, since I > > always work with most warnings enabled. > > Usually that's the better way for me than hunting > > behind avoidable bugs, even > > if it means that I must take some detour to get the > > toolchain satisfied. > That could be called "best-practices"? Anyway, that > can help a lot, as in your case. > > IMHO the correct way to implement such features > > would be to enable all such > > warnings by default, > > so that the unaware user (like me) always gets the > > security net activated. > Have you suggested that to ADI? What about > cross-posting this to comp.dsp, to make some sort of > survey about what other users say? Here's part of the response from ADI: > ... > In our next major VisualDSP++ 4.0 release warnings for incomplete > function prototypes will be on by default when building using an IDDE > project (this warning option can be disabled by de-selecting the > checkbox). > ... Bernhard |
|
|
AW: Compiler error (Sharc 21161) ?! - FYI: ADI response
Started by ●December 6, 2004
Reply by ●December 6, 20042004-12-06
|
Thanks, Benrhard You are in the right track! Regards, JaaC --- Bernhard Holzmayer <> wrote: > > > Just for those who followed the discussion and are > interested in the topic: > > > > I had been sure that I did enable the warning > about > > > missing prototypes, since I > > > always work with most warnings enabled. > > > Usually that's the better way for me than > hunting > > > behind avoidable bugs, even > > > if it means that I must take some detour to get > the > > > toolchain satisfied. > > > That could be called "best-practices"? Anyway, > that > > can help a lot, as in your case. > > > > IMHO the correct way to implement such features > > > would be to enable all such > > > warnings by default, > > > so that the unaware user (like me) always gets > the > > > security net activated. > > > Have you suggested that to ADI? What about > > cross-posting this to comp.dsp, to make some sort > of > > survey about what other users say? > Here's part of the response from ADI: > > > ... > > In our next major VisualDSP++ 4.0 release warnings > for incomplete > > function prototypes will be on by default when > building using an IDDE > > project (this warning option can be disabled by > de-selecting the > > checkbox). > > ... > Bernhard ===== Jaime Andr Aranguren Cardona __________________________________________________ |
