Hello
I need to implement UART on ADSP21363. I find EE note on Analog web site for
previous Sharc, solution is based on SPORT.
Does anyone have experience on 2136x.
I also find MAX3100 chip (UART on SPI), Does anyone have experience with
this chip ?
Thanks in advance
UART on ADSP21363
Started by ●January 29, 2008
Reply by ●January 30, 20082008-01-30
Sthane GOUEL - ARBOS wrote:
>
> Hello
>
>
>
> I need to implement UART on ADSP21363. I find EE note on Analog web
> site for previous Sharc, solution is based on SPORT.
>
>
>
> Does anyone have experience on 2136x.
>
I have used the method in the ap note with a 21262. It works OK but it
would be easier with a 21369 since you have a UART.
>
>
> I also find MAX3100 chip (UART on SPI), Does anyone have experience
> with this chip ?
>
> I,m sure it will work but it is more expensive than the SPORT method.
>
You need to be careful with the 21363/4 with respect to DMA, Read the
errata.
Al Clark
Danville Signal Processing, Inc.
> ._,_.___
> Messages in this topic
>
> (1)
>
>
> Hello
>
>
>
> I need to implement UART on ADSP21363. I find EE note on Analog web
> site for previous Sharc, solution is based on SPORT.
>
>
>
> Does anyone have experience on 2136x.
>
I have used the method in the ap note with a 21262. It works OK but it
would be easier with a 21369 since you have a UART.
>
>
> I also find MAX3100 chip (UART on SPI), Does anyone have experience
> with this chip ?
>
> I,m sure it will work but it is more expensive than the SPORT method.
>
You need to be careful with the 21363/4 with respect to DMA, Read the
errata.
Al Clark
Danville Signal Processing, Inc.
> ._,_.___
> Messages in this topic
>
> (1)
>
Reply by ●January 30, 20082008-01-30
Its for 21363, solution seems more easy with MAX3100, what you mean about
DMA ?
Is solution with SPORT is easy to implement ?
_____
De : a... [mailto:a...] De la part de Al
Clark
Envoy: mercredi 30 janvier 2008 06:21
: Sthane GOUEL - ARBOS
Cc : a...
Objet : Re: [adsp] UART on ADSP21363
Sthane GOUEL - ARBOS wrote:
>
> Hello
>
>
>
> I need to implement UART on ADSP21363. I find EE note on Analog web
> site for previous Sharc, solution is based on SPORT.
>
>
>
> Does anyone have experience on 2136x.
>
I have used the method in the ap note with a 21262. It works OK but it
would be easier with a 21369 since you have a UART.
>
>
> I also find MAX3100 chip (UART on SPI), Does anyone have experience
> with this chip ?
>
> I,m sure it will work but it is more expensive than the SPORT method.
>
You need to be careful with the 21363/4 with respect to DMA, Read the
errata.
Al Clark
Danville Signal Processing, Inc.
DMA ?
Is solution with SPORT is easy to implement ?
_____
De : a... [mailto:a...] De la part de Al
Clark
Envoy: mercredi 30 janvier 2008 06:21
: Sthane GOUEL - ARBOS
Cc : a...
Objet : Re: [adsp] UART on ADSP21363
Sthane GOUEL - ARBOS wrote:
>
> Hello
>
>
>
> I need to implement UART on ADSP21363. I find EE note on Analog web
> site for previous Sharc, solution is based on SPORT.
>
>
>
> Does anyone have experience on 2136x.
>
I have used the method in the ap note with a 21262. It works OK but it
would be easier with a 21369 since you have a UART.
>
>
> I also find MAX3100 chip (UART on SPI), Does anyone have experience
> with this chip ?
>
> I,m sure it will work but it is more expensive than the SPORT method.
>
You need to be careful with the 21363/4 with respect to DMA, Read the
errata.
Al Clark
Danville Signal Processing, Inc.
Reply by ●January 30, 20082008-01-30
Sthane GOUEL - ARBOS wrote:
>
> Its for 21363, solution seems more easy with MAX3100, what you mean
> about DMA ?
>
Look at IC anomaly #3 in the 21363 list.
> Is solution with SPORT is easy to implement ?
>
I don't remember any real difficulties. We did it several years ago.
The 21369 is close to the same price as the 21363. We make several 21262
boards and then skipped the 21363/4 and migrated to 21369 for new
designs. We use 21371 for lower cost targets.
Al Clark
Danville Signal Processing, Inc.
>
>
> *De :* a... [mailto:a...] *De la part
> de* Al Clark
> *Envoy:* mercredi 30 janvier 2008 06:21
> *:* Sthane GOUEL - ARBOS
> *Cc :* a...
> *Objet :* Re: [adsp] UART on ADSP21363
>
> Sthane GOUEL - ARBOS wrote:
> >
> > Hello
> >
> >
> >
> > I need to implement UART on ADSP21363. I find EE note on Analog web
> > site for previous Sharc, solution is based on SPORT.
> >
> >
> >
> > Does anyone have experience on 2136x.
> > I have used the method in the ap note with a 21262. It works OK but it
> would be easier with a 21369 since you have a UART.
>
> >
> >
> > I also find MAX3100 chip (UART on SPI), Does anyone have experience
> > with this chip ?
> >
> > I,m sure it will work but it is more expensive than the SPORT method.
> > You need to be careful with the 21363/4 with respect to DMA, Read the
> errata.
>
> Al Clark
> Danville Signal Processing, Inc.
>
> > ._,_.___
> > Messages in this topic
> >
> > > > (1)
> >
> >
>
> Its for 21363, solution seems more easy with MAX3100, what you mean
> about DMA ?
>
Look at IC anomaly #3 in the 21363 list.
> Is solution with SPORT is easy to implement ?
>
I don't remember any real difficulties. We did it several years ago.
The 21369 is close to the same price as the 21363. We make several 21262
boards and then skipped the 21363/4 and migrated to 21369 for new
designs. We use 21371 for lower cost targets.
Al Clark
Danville Signal Processing, Inc.
>
>
> *De :* a... [mailto:a...] *De la part
> de* Al Clark
> *Envoy:* mercredi 30 janvier 2008 06:21
> *:* Sthane GOUEL - ARBOS
> *Cc :* a...
> *Objet :* Re: [adsp] UART on ADSP21363
>
> Sthane GOUEL - ARBOS wrote:
> >
> > Hello
> >
> >
> >
> > I need to implement UART on ADSP21363. I find EE note on Analog web
> > site for previous Sharc, solution is based on SPORT.
> >
> >
> >
> > Does anyone have experience on 2136x.
> > I have used the method in the ap note with a 21262. It works OK but it
> would be easier with a 21369 since you have a UART.
>
> >
> >
> > I also find MAX3100 chip (UART on SPI), Does anyone have experience
> > with this chip ?
> >
> > I,m sure it will work but it is more expensive than the SPORT method.
> > You need to be careful with the 21363/4 with respect to DMA, Read the
> errata.
>
> Al Clark
> Danville Signal Processing, Inc.
>
> > ._,_.___
> > Messages in this topic
> >
> > > > (1)
> >
> >
Reply by ●January 30, 20082008-01-30
Ok, but i'm working on VDSP++ 5.0 IC anomaly is obsolete so, VDSP
compile
"avoid it"
-----Message d'origine-----
De: a... [mailto:a...] De la part de Al
Clark
Envoy mercredi 30 janvier 2008 16:33
: Sthane GOUEL - ARBOS
Cc: a...
Objet: Re: [adsp] UART on ADSP21363
Sthane GOUEL - ARBOS wrote:
>
> Its for 21363, solution seems more easy with MAX3100, what you mean
> about DMA ?
>
Look at IC anomaly #3 in the 21363 list.
> Is solution with SPORT is easy to implement ?
>
I don't remember any real difficulties. We did it several years ago.
The 21369 is close to the same price as the 21363. We make several 21262
boards and then skipped the 21363/4 and migrated to 21369 for new
designs. We use 21371 for lower cost targets.
Al Clark
Danville Signal Processing, Inc.
>
>
> *De :* a... [mailto:a...] *De la part
> de* Al Clark
> *Envoy:* mercredi 30 janvier 2008 06:21
> *:* Sthane GOUEL - ARBOS
> *Cc :* a...
> *Objet :* Re: [adsp] UART on ADSP21363
>
> Sthane GOUEL - ARBOS wrote:
> >
> > Hello
> >
> >
> >
> > I need to implement UART on ADSP21363. I find EE note on Analog web
> > site for previous Sharc, solution is based on SPORT.
> >
> >
> >
> > Does anyone have experience on 2136x.
> > I have used the method in the ap note with a 21262. It works OK but it
> would be easier with a 21369 since you have a UART.
>
> >
> >
> > I also find MAX3100 chip (UART on SPI), Does anyone have experience
> > with this chip ?
> >
> > I,m sure it will work but it is more expensive than the SPORT method.
> > You need to be careful with the 21363/4 with respect to DMA, Read the
> errata.
>
> Al Clark
> Danville Signal Processing, Inc.
>
> > ._,_.___
> > Messages in this topic
> >
>
k3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzEwNzM3NDgEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA1MDA0NzI2BG1zZ0lkAzYxMDQEc2VjA2
Z0cgRzbGsDdnRwYwRzdGltZQMxMjAxNjU2NzEwBHRwY0lkAzYxMDQ-
>
k3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzEwNzM3NDgEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA1MDA0NzI2BG1zZ0lkAzYxMDQEc2VjA2
Z0cgRzbGsDdnRwYwRzdGltZQMxMjAxNjU2NzEwBHRwY0lkAzYxMDQ->>
>
> > (1)
> >
>
E0BGdycElkAzEwNzM3NDgEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA1MDA0NzI2BG1zZ0lkAzYxMDQEc2VjA2Z0cgRzbG
sDcnBseQRzdGltZQMxMjAxNjU2NzEw?act=reply&messageNum=6104
>
E0BGdycElkAzEwNzM3NDgEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA1MDA0NzI2BG1zZ0lkAzYxMDQEc2VjA2Z0cgRzbG
sDcnBseQRzdGltZQMxMjAxNjU2NzEw?act=reply&messageNum=6104>>
>
"avoid it"
-----Message d'origine-----
De: a... [mailto:a...] De la part de Al
Clark
Envoy mercredi 30 janvier 2008 16:33
: Sthane GOUEL - ARBOS
Cc: a...
Objet: Re: [adsp] UART on ADSP21363
Sthane GOUEL - ARBOS wrote:
>
> Its for 21363, solution seems more easy with MAX3100, what you mean
> about DMA ?
>
Look at IC anomaly #3 in the 21363 list.
> Is solution with SPORT is easy to implement ?
>
I don't remember any real difficulties. We did it several years ago.
The 21369 is close to the same price as the 21363. We make several 21262
boards and then skipped the 21363/4 and migrated to 21369 for new
designs. We use 21371 for lower cost targets.
Al Clark
Danville Signal Processing, Inc.
>
>
> *De :* a... [mailto:a...] *De la part
> de* Al Clark
> *Envoy:* mercredi 30 janvier 2008 06:21
> *:* Sthane GOUEL - ARBOS
> *Cc :* a...
> *Objet :* Re: [adsp] UART on ADSP21363
>
> Sthane GOUEL - ARBOS wrote:
> >
> > Hello
> >
> >
> >
> > I need to implement UART on ADSP21363. I find EE note on Analog web
> > site for previous Sharc, solution is based on SPORT.
> >
> >
> >
> > Does anyone have experience on 2136x.
> > I have used the method in the ap note with a 21262. It works OK but it
> would be easier with a 21369 since you have a UART.
>
> >
> >
> > I also find MAX3100 chip (UART on SPI), Does anyone have experience
> > with this chip ?
> >
> > I,m sure it will work but it is more expensive than the SPORT method.
> > You need to be careful with the 21363/4 with respect to DMA, Read the
> errata.
>
> Al Clark
> Danville Signal Processing, Inc.
>
> > ._,_.___
> > Messages in this topic
> >
>
k3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzEwNzM3NDgEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA1MDA0NzI2BG1zZ0lkAzYxMDQEc2VjA2
Z0cgRzbGsDdnRwYwRzdGltZQMxMjAxNjU2NzEwBHRwY0lkAzYxMDQ-
>
k3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzEwNzM3NDgEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA1MDA0NzI2BG1zZ0lkAzYxMDQEc2VjA2
Z0cgRzbGsDdnRwYwRzdGltZQMxMjAxNjU2NzEwBHRwY0lkAzYxMDQ->>
>
> > (1)
> >
>
E0BGdycElkAzEwNzM3NDgEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA1MDA0NzI2BG1zZ0lkAzYxMDQEc2VjA2Z0cgRzbG
sDcnBseQRzdGltZQMxMjAxNjU2NzEw?act=reply&messageNum=6104
>
E0BGdycElkAzEwNzM3NDgEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA1MDA0NzI2BG1zZ0lkAzYxMDQEc2VjA2Z0cgRzbG
sDcnBseQRzdGltZQMxMjAxNjU2NzEw?act=reply&messageNum=6104>>
>
Reply by ●February 27, 20082008-02-27
Hello
I need to implement an SPI using DAI pins because SPI dedicated pins are
used to boot. Is there anybody has a small piece of code which demonstrate
how to configure and use it because my following piece of code doesnt
works.
Routing using SRU macros : (CLK, MISO and MOSI)
Flag0 used as chip select and configure directly by SPIFLGB register
Do you have an idea on what is wrong, or a small piece of code for example.
Thanks in advance.
a04/stime01656710/nc1E07179/nc2848583/nc3I90216>
I need to implement an SPI using DAI pins because SPI dedicated pins are
used to boot. Is there anybody has a small piece of code which demonstrate
how to configure and use it because my following piece of code doesnt
works.
Routing using SRU macros : (CLK, MISO and MOSI)
Flag0 used as chip select and configure directly by SPIFLGB register
Do you have an idea on what is wrong, or a small piece of code for example.
Thanks in advance.
a04/stime01656710/nc1E07179/nc2848583/nc3I90216>
