Hi All, I am trying to set up an ADC to interface with my DSP and I was wondering-- what is keeping me from "underclocking" the ADC? It's specified sampling rate is 65 MSPS, but I clock it at 50 MSPS, so I can clock it with the DSP unit, rather than setting up a clocking circuit. Not really a DSP question, but I thought a seasoned engineer would have an informative response. My guess is that the device should function just fine at 50 MSPS, but I'm a rookie, so if anybody has any advice regarding, please oblige me. Cordially, Michael Lee |
|
ADC clock rate
Started by ●August 4, 2002
Reply by ●August 6, 20022002-08-06
Hello, > I am trying to set up an ADC to interface with my DSP and I was > wondering-- what is keeping me from "underclocking" the ADC? The answer is most probably nothing. The ADC's datasheet (easily found using google) will give a definitive answer, but since we're talking about 65 MBPS vs. 50 MBPS, I wouldn't bother. > It's > specified sampling rate is 65 MSPS, but I clock it at 50 MSPS, so I > can clock it with the DSP unit, rather than setting up a clocking > circuit. Now, here we have a catch. The DSP gives a 50 MHz clock, but I'm not sure you want to use it as a sample clock. The clock has a high jitter, which means that the exact timing each clock edge is randomly shifted. It's a tiny shift, but since it's random, it affects the quality of the samples. If you'll analyze the sampled signal, you may discover that the SNR is much lower than the original, analog signal. The behavior can also be interpreted as if the sampled signals had a high phase noise. This may still be acceptable in many applications, so if you're not very uptight about SNR, using the DSP's clock may be an adequate solution. BTW, this phenomenum is evident when using the DSP's clock for an DAC. You get a lot of noise that wasn't in the samples. Same explanation. Good luck & skill, Eli |