|
I remembered when I was using CCS1.2, I had problem related to RTDX when the code is boot from ROM, instead of downloading from CCS. So when I remove all RTDX related components, everything works fine thereafter. In your case, you might want to check the following few things: - .cinit section should be ROM initialization (linker option) - Try to move .cinit, .sysinit, .bios, .gblinit above address 0x8000, or see if you can move all DSP/BIOS related section above 0x8000 (low 32K) - Check your HEX image map file and make sure section .sysregs (address 0x7C) is really in there. I remember there is some sort of problem related to the HEX500 program when the .out file contains address above 0x80. Hope this help Ben --- James Ou <> wrote: > Thank you very much for your help. > I don't use the RTDX and all of its Component and > all > of what you stated as below. We use DSP/BIOS . Does > there any other passable reason ? > > Again, Thanks a lot ! > > James > --- Benjamin Chan <> gDG> Do > you > use DSP/BIOS in your design? If the answer is > > yes, then you might want to remove all RTDX > > component > > and their association, including real-time > analysis, > > Host channel manager that use RTDX for Host link > and > > of course the RTDX module itself. > > > > Hope this help > > > > Ben > > --- j_ouh <> wrote: > > > Hi, group, > > > > > > I am using TMS320C5416 and CCS1.2/XDS-510. > > > Currently, we are facing > > > a wiered compiler problem that has been > bothering > > us > > > for a long > > > time. I am hoping that if someone can give us a > > > clue. > > > > > > Basically, this is what happen: when a program > is > > > running under the > > > development environment (CCS1.2/XDS-510/Target > > > Machine) the program > > > executed as expected. However, the build is > > complete > > > and .out was > > > burned into the external ROM, sometimes an > > > unexpected error > > > execution will occur. Our current solution to > this > > > is changing the > > > linker sequence and recompile several times. > After > > > few attemps, we > > > might got a good executable (once it took as > long > > as > > > 5 days or > > > hundreds of retries). > > > > > > J. Ouh. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _____________________________________ > > > Note: If you do a simple "reply" with your email > > > client, only the author of this message will > > receive > > > your answer. You need to do a "reply all" if > you > > > want your answer to be distributed to the entire > > > group. > > > > > > _____________________________________ > > > About this discussion group: > > > > > > To Join: Send an email to > > > > > > > > > To Post: Send an email to > > > > > > To Leave: Send an email to > > > > > > > > > Archives: http://www.yahoogroups.com/group/c54x > > > > > > Other Groups: http://www.dsprelated.com > > > > > > > > > ">http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > > > > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > > > > _____________________________________ > > Note: If you do a simple "reply" with your email > > client, only the author of this message will > receive > > your answer. You need to do a "reply all" if you > > want your answer to be distributed to the entire > > group. > > > > _____________________________________ > > About this discussion group: > > > > To Join: Send an email to > > > > > > To Post: Send an email to > > > > To Leave: Send an email to > > > > > > Archives: http://www.yahoogroups.com/group/c54x > > > > Other Groups: http://www.dsprelated.com > > > > > > ">http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > > > _________________________________________________________ > http://chinese.mail.yahoo.com __________________________________________________ |
Re: wierd behavior of CCS/Compiler[Scanned]
Started by ●August 25, 2002
