McBSP on C55

hi
1- Why when I used mcbsp1.pjt on examples\C5502 folder for c5502 dsp some of the definitions for example SPCR1 were not proper for C5502 and I changed their sub fields.

2- Why in debuge step of my code, when I use F10 or F5+break point, the result of "PFUNC" function (described in spra177) is false but when I trace my programe using F11 it works properly?

Regards Start a New Thread

To answer question 1. It's possible that McBsp on 5502 is slightly different
from that on 5510, since I know 5509A's is different with 5510's. You'd
better check out the McBsp specs.

Wei

--- In c..., ahmadagha23@... wrote:
>
> hi
> 1- Why when I used mcbsp1.pjt on examples\C5502 folder for c5502 dsp
some of the definitions for example SPCR1 were not proper for C5502 and
I changed their sub fields.
>
> 2- Why in debuge step of my code, when I use F10 or F5+break point,
the result of "PFUNC" function (described in spra177) is false but when I
trace my programe using F11 it works properly?
>
> Regards
> Start a New Thread

I know they differ but I am confusing why in the example\c5502 folder
which is dedicated for c5502 the code is not matched and does not run
for c5502???? this problem exist still in CCS3.3.
Is it needed for me to provide a correct project and send it for TI?
Regards
--- In c..., "Wei Li" wrote:
>
> To answer question 1. It's possible that McBsp on 5502 is slightly
different
> from that on 5510, since I know 5509A's is different with 5510's.
You'd
> better check out the McBsp specs.
>
> Wei
>
> --- In c..., ahmadagha23@ wrote:
> >
> > hi
> > 1- Why when I used mcbsp1.pjt on examples\C5502 folder for c5502
dsp
> some of the definitions for example SPCR1 were not proper for C5502
and
> I changed their sub fields.
> >
> > 2- Why in debuge step of my code, when I use F10 or F5+break
point,
> the result of "PFUNC" function (described in spra177) is false but
when I
> trace my programe using F11 it works properly?
> >
> > Regards
> Start a New Thread