implementation of OFDM-MFSK

hi
can anyone have the idea how to implement OFDM-MFSK in matlab .
Regards

On May 19, 5:08&#4294967295;am, "shamma" <shammashah...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> hi
> can anyone have the idea how to implement OFDM-MFSK in matlab .
> Regards

Yes.
1.  Start MATLAB.
2.  Start coding.

Or were you looking for somebody to give you the complete code
for free?

shamma wrote:

> hi
> can anyone have the idea how to implement OFDM-MFSK in matlab .
> Regards

>On May 19, 5:08=A0am, "shamma" <shammashah...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> hi
>> can anyone have the idea how to implement OFDM-MFSK in matlab .
>> Regards
>
>Yes.
>1.  Start MATLAB.
>2.  Start coding.
>
>Or were you looking for somebody to give you the complete code
>for free?
>
For your information i have implemented OFDM in matlab using QPSK....i
have also implemented OFDM using MFSK but just confused about its
implementation ......and i am not wanting a code for free ....its was just
an idea on how to implement ..........people here help each other for free
......if you help people for money than you should better leave this group
.....i guess this is not the right place for you ....(by the way you should
know that there are many codes available on the internet for free)

>>On May 19, 5:08=A0am, "shamma" <shammashah...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>> hi
>>> can anyone have the idea how to implement OFDM-MFSK in matlab .
>>> Regards
>>
>>Yes.
>>1.  Start MATLAB.
>>2.  Start coding.
>>
>>Or were you looking for somebody to give you the complete code
>>for free?
>>
>For your information i have implemented OFDM in matlab using QPSK....i
>have also implemented OFDM using MFSK but just confused about its
>implementation ......and i am not wanting a code for free ....its was
just
>an idea on how to implement ..........people here help each other for
free
>......if you help people for money than you should better leave this
group
>.....i guess this is not the right place for you ....(by the way you
should
>know that there are many codes available on the internet for free)

This seems implausible. If someone has implemented something, and has hit
a problem, I would expect a much more focused question than the one you
posted. Your question screams of "I'm too lazy/stupid to do anything.
Please do it for me".

Steve

On May 21, 5:56&#4294967295;am, "shamma" <shammashah...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >On May 19, 5:08=A0am, "shamma" <shammashah...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> hi
> >> can anyone have the idea how to implement OFDM-MFSK in matlab .
> >> Regards
>
> >Yes.
> >1. &#4294967295;Start MATLAB.
> >2. &#4294967295;Start coding.
>
> >Or were you looking for somebody to give you the complete code
> >for free?
>
> For your information i have implemented OFDM in matlab using QPSK....i
> have also implemented OFDM using MFSK but just confused about its
> implementation ......and i am not wanting a code for free ....its was just
> an idea on how to implement ..........people here help each other for free
> ......if you help people for money than you should better leave this group
> .....i guess this is not the right place for you ....(by the way you should
> know that there are many codes available on the internet for free)

From what I've read, OFDM-MFSK only uses sends one subcarrier per
block of M in any given symbol. I can see an advantage to this because
the subcarrier phases can be arbitrary, allowing PAPR to be optimized,
but I'm wondering what other advantage there might be that outweighs
the 1/M reduction in throughput.

John

you cant say this thing about anybody if u dont know him right it may be
that i lack any writing skills and i dont explain my questions rightly 





















>>>On May 19, 5:08=A0am, "shamma" <shammashah...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>> hi
>>>> can anyone have the idea how to implement OFDM-MFSK in matlab .
>>>> Regards
>>>
>>>Yes.
>>>1.  Start MATLAB.
>>>2.  Start coding.
>>>
>>>Or were you looking for somebody to give you the complete code
>>>for free?
>>>
>>For your information i have implemented OFDM in matlab using QPSK....i
>>have also implemented OFDM using MFSK but just confused about its
>>implementation ......and i am not wanting a code for free ....its was
>just
>>an idea on how to implement ..........people here help each other for
>free
>>......if you help people for money than you should better leave this
>group
>>.....i guess this is not the right place for you ....(by the way you
>should
>>know that there are many codes available on the internet for free)
>
>This seems implausible. If someone has implemented something, and has
hit
>a problem, I would expect a much more focused question than the one you
>posted. Your question screams of "I'm too lazy/stupid to do anything.
>Please do it for me".
>
>Steve
>
>

hi 
   i want to confirm that if i use 4-FSK for data 00 10 01 11
can i use the the following data [1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1]
is it right to send data like this i have choosen a 0 phase for every
subcarrier in this case
thanx for your kind reply 













>On May 21, 5:56=A0am, "shamma" <shammashah...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> >On May 19, 5:08=3DA0am, "shamma" <shammashah...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> >> hi
>> >> can anyone have the idea how to implement OFDM-MFSK in matlab .
>> >> Regards
>>
>> >Yes.
>> >1. =A0Start MATLAB.
>> >2. =A0Start coding.
>>
>> >Or were you looking for somebody to give you the complete code
>> >for free?
>>
>> For your information i have implemented OFDM in matlab using QPSK....i
>> have also implemented OFDM using MFSK but just confused about its
>> implementation ......and i am not wanting a code for free ....its was
jus=
>t
>> an idea on how to implement ..........people here help each other for
fre=
>e
>> ......if you help people for money than you should better leave this
grou=
>p
>> .....i guess this is not the right place for you ....(by the way you
shou=
>ld
>> know that there are many codes available on the internet for free)
>
>From what I've read, OFDM-MFSK only uses sends one subcarrier per
>block of M in any given symbol. I can see an advantage to this because
>the subcarrier phases can be arbitrary, allowing PAPR to be optimized,
>but I'm wondering what other advantage there might be that outweighs
>the 1/M reduction in throughput.
>
>John
>