design of adptive DFE

>

I am not replicating anything. They just gave experimental results, which
does nt say much. I am doing simulation. Because we have done some
experiment as well and the multipath was one symbol!!!!! And nobody can
afford to go to sea everytime apart from these MIT/WHOI guys. I know even u
r from MIT. Recently I found soft copy of your thesis as well. And then I
thot, no wonder this guy knows a lot abt timing synchronization...

To tell u the fact 4ksys/sec is nothing. We have successfully demonstrated
and developed modems for 10ksys/sec for underwater comms for ranges up to
10kms!!! and still we use LMS, not even NLMS or RLS.

It is just that I like simulations a lot so was doing all these.

On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 10:48:51 -0700 (PDT), robert bristow-johnson
<rbj@audioimagination.com> wrote:

>On Jun 10, 11:45&#4294967295;am, Richard Owlett <rowl...@atlascomm.net> wrote:
>> rickman wrote:
>...
>> > I think your post would have been even more annoying to V if you had
>> > just left out the reference to his insult altogether. &#4294967295;Most trolls are
>> > infuriated if, while he is standing right next to you, you continue
>> > your conversation as if he wasn't even in the room.
>>
>> It may be even more effective to politely acknowlege V's existence and
>> then carry on a polite conversation. IT might catch on - though I doubt
>> he'll notice.
>
>i don't even know what it is?  student with a "pi" stuck in it?
>
>curiopius,
>
>r b-j

I want to take nothing away from Vlad's DSP skill and intellect.
However, his skill in personal relationships, such as courtesy to
others is sadly lacking.

I've seen Vladimir's posts with "STUPIDENT" in the subject line.
These posts are just to make Vlad feel larger than he actually is.  

I dare say that there was/is a time when Vladdy didn't know something
and he may have actually asked a question of someone who knew more
than he (is that ACTUALLY possible?).  Any one of those times, some
person of low regard for others could have called him a "stupident" as
he does so frequently and callously to others here.

Most people come to these forums to learn something.  Not everyone who
asks questions here has a PhD - or any degree for that matter.  There
is no charter that states question askers must have any specific
degree or qualification that I'm aware of, so I would expect a wide
range of skill levels to visit here, and I would also expect that
their questions will reflect that.

Vlad: Calling people you don't value names will not make them run away
and not return.  Personally, my advice to you, Vlad is the same as
your mother ought to have taught you:

--  If you have nothing nice or helpful to say - STFU.

On Jun 10, 6:00&#4294967295;pm, Manny <mlou...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Jun 10, 8:56&#4294967295;pm, dbd <d...@ieee.org> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jun 10, 10:48 am, robert bristow-johnson
>
> > <r...@audioimagination.com> wrote:
> > > On Jun 10, 11:45 am, Richard Owlett <rowl...@atlascomm.net> wrote:
> > > > rickman wrote:
> > > ...
>
> > .> > > I think your post would have been even more annoying to V if
> > you had
> > .> > > just left out the reference to his insult altogether. &#4294967295;Most
> > trolls are
>
> > > > > infuriated if, while he is standing right next to you, you continue
> > > > > your conversation as if he wasn't even in the room.
> > > > It may be even more effective to politely acknowlege V's existence and
> > > > then carry on a polite conversation. IT might catch on - though I doubt
> > > > he'll notice.
>
> > ,> i don't even know what it is? &#4294967295;student with a "pi" stuck in it?
> > ,>
> > ,> curiopius,
>
> > > r b-j
>
> > Gee guys, are you sure that V-dude is trying to be insulting?
>
> > I always thought "STUPIDENT" was simply an involuntary utterance. Sort
> > of a self-deprecating keyboard based version of Tourette's syndrome
> > that produces a response whenever his subconscious detects a posting
> > that he lacks the knowledge, competence, communication skills, common
> > decency and cool to reply adequately to, even though this doesn't
> > always deter him from responding. It seemed less likely at first, but
> > by now the evidence seems overwhelming.
>
> > Dale B. Dalrymple
>
> It also could be a vicious cycle of insolence he's caught up with.
> Freud would trace this back to an early childhood abuse. It's like
> mother_1 who's having a hard time disciplining children_1. Mother_1
> not feeling in the mood, Boss is not having _s e x_ lately. Growing
> ever grumpy, boss starts reprimanding father excessively at work.
> Becoming polarized, father can't help but passing on his negative
> energy to mother_2 who, in turn, passes it on to children_2.
> Children_2 go about bullying other children on the block and as a
> result children_1 end up getting some of their own medicine. On and on
> the cycle goes. What remains is for us to know where in the chain he
> truly lies.

For whatever reason, my problem is that I hate seeing the word
"STUPIDENT" in a subject line.  It's almost a phobia... what does that
say about me?

Even worse is the word "STUDIOT", but that seems to have fallen out of
use.

Rick