Dirk, I think it depends on how one construes "delay". A _real_ Butterworth filte= r (as distinguished from a digital approximation) exhibits a response as so= on as an input is applied. It may be small enough to go unnoticed, but it's= there. Was Rune splitting hairs? Jerry
Re: delay added by matlab butterworth filter
Started by ●January 24, 2011
Reply by ●January 24, 20112011-01-24
On Jan 24, 1:39�pm, Jerry Avins <j...@ieee.org> wrote:> Dirk, > > I think it depends on how one construes "delay". A _real_ Butterworth filter (as distinguished from a digital approximation) exhibits a response as soon as an input is applied. It may be small enough to go unnoticed, but it's there. Was Rune splitting hairs? > > JerryJerry, If you put an impulse into the filter and look at the response you see the most impulsive part of the output delayed. Based on the OPs comments about a delay of 1/Wn it appears that is what he is referring to. That is an effective 'delay' (granted, a function of freq), and the OP should be getting it. When we talk about typical linear-phase filters we don't talk about them having no delay because the first output point is non-zero. Dirk