Dear administrator, i'm very sorry to contact you. I have replied "how to do diagonal edge detection in image processing?" by postingsome code of Matlab.but today i received a email from The MathWorks, Inc.They tell me that i can't post it in public.so i want you delete it at once. thank you Happy New Year andy 2004.1.1
to administrators of the comp.dsp ,instancy!
Started by ●December 31, 2003
Reply by ●December 31, 20032003-12-31
what can i do now?> MathWorks watching like hawks, hey? Ha. > > Usenet is strange, in that there is no central repository or > administrator for the messages. Once posted, it goes out to many > newservers, owned by different companies, etc. So, I don't believe it > can be easily retracted. I have seen things like posts being > cancelled, but that is more involved. > > This one time shouldn't kill them. > > Robert > > "ANDY" <wangzhengyao@hotmail.com> wrote: > > >Dear administrator, > > > >i'm very sorry to contact you. > > > >I have replied "how to do diagonal edge detection in image processing?"by> >postingsome code of Matlab.but today i received a email from TheMathWorks,> >Inc.They tell me that i can't post it in public.so i want you delete itat> >once. > > > >thank you > > > >Happy New Year > > > >andy > >2004.1.1 > > > > > ( modify address for return email ) > > www.numbersusa.com > www.americanpatrol.com
Reply by ●January 1, 20042004-01-01
In article bt02ln$2spo$1@mail.cn99.com, ANDY at wangzhengyao@hotmail.com wrote on 12/31/2003 22:02:> what can i do now?just sit tight. i don't think anyone at Mathworks is gonna bother with this anymore. andy, you gotta watch out for notes like this: % Copyright 1993-2002 The MathWorks, Inc. % $Revision: 5.26 $ $Date: 2002/03/26 16:39:10 $ that means the code, even the text, does not belong to you. you certainly can post your own MATLAB code. r b-j>> MathWorks watching like hawks, hey? Ha.i just wish they'd fix their horrible indexing problem. r b-j
Reply by ●January 1, 20042004-01-01
MathWorks watching like hawks, hey? Ha. Usenet is strange, in that there is no central repository or administrator for the messages. Once posted, it goes out to many newservers, owned by different companies, etc. So, I don't believe it can be easily retracted. I have seen things like posts being cancelled, but that is more involved. This one time shouldn't kill them. Robert "ANDY" <wangzhengyao@hotmail.com> wrote:>Dear administrator, > >i'm very sorry to contact you. > >I have replied "how to do diagonal edge detection in image processing?" by >postingsome code of Matlab.but today i received a email from The MathWorks, >Inc.They tell me that i can't post it in public.so i want you delete it at >once. > >thank you > >Happy New Year > >andy >2004.1.1 >( modify address for return email ) www.numbersusa.com www.americanpatrol.com
Reply by ●January 1, 20042004-01-01
Thank you! "robert bristow-johnson" <rbj@surfglobal.net> wrote in message news:BC190AF0.74F3%rbj@surfglobal.net...> In article bt02ln$2spo$1@mail.cn99.com, ANDY at wangzhengyao@hotmail.com > wrote on 12/31/2003 22:02: > > > what can i do now? > > just sit tight. i don't think anyone at Mathworks is gonna bother withthis> anymore. > > andy, you gotta watch out for notes like this: > > % Copyright 1993-2002 The MathWorks, Inc. > % $Revision: 5.26 $ $Date: 2002/03/26 16:39:10 $ > > that means the code, even the text, does not belong to you. > > you certainly can post your own MATLAB code. > > r b-j > > > >> MathWorks watching like hawks, hey? Ha. > > i just wish they'd fix their horrible indexing problem. > > r b-j > >
Reply by ●January 1, 20042004-01-01
<r_obert@REMOVE_THIS.hotmail.com> wrote in message news:mt87vvcrl22ql7nbg8l26426s3mjeapjn3@4ax.com...> MathWorks watching like hawks, hey? Ha. >Yep, gotta get their ideas from somewhere!!> Usenet is strange, in that there is no central repository or > administrator for the messages. Once posted, it goes out to many > newservers, owned by different companies, etc. So, I don't believe it > can be easily retracted. I have seen things like posts being > cancelled, but that is more involved. > > This one time shouldn't kill them. > > Robert > > "ANDY" <wangzhengyao@hotmail.com> wrote: > > >Dear administrator, > > > >i'm very sorry to contact you. > > > >I have replied "how to do diagonal edge detection in image processing?"by> >postingsome code of Matlab.but today i received a email from TheMathWorks,> >Inc.They tell me that i can't post it in public.so i want you delete itat> >once. > > > >thank you > > > >Happy New Year > > > >andy > >2004.1.1 > > > > > ( modify address for return email ) > > www.numbersusa.com > www.americanpatrol.com
Reply by ●January 2, 20042004-01-02
"TheDoc" <TheDoc@ev1.net> wrote in message news:<vv9pst9e9ics88@corp.supernews.com>...> <r_obert@REMOVE_THIS.hotmail.com> wrote in message > news:mt87vvcrl22ql7nbg8l26426s3mjeapjn3@4ax.com... > > MathWorks watching like hawks, hey? Ha. > > > > Yep, gotta get their ideas from somewhere!! >Not from comp.dsp, that's for sure. Check out their FILTFILT routine in the Signal Processing toolbox. Somewhere in there they claim that the length of the impulse response of an IIR filter equals max(a,b) where a and b are the number of coefficients of the nominator and denominator of the rational filter transfer function. Also, in the function PMUSIC they return the MUSIC pseudo spectrum without mentioning a word about what a pseudo spectrum is and how it differs from a signal spectrum. Having said that, the MathWorks is in good company. The book "Computer- Based Exercises for Signal Processing using Matlab 5" by McClellan et al. doesn't get that point either. In their project involving MUSIC and related methods (around page 200) they consistently talk about the MUSIC spectrum. They don't even include the modifier "pseudo", let alone explain what it means and how it is important. Check out my post http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=f56893ae.0312101559.6bc77f7%40posting.google.com&output=gplain for an attempt to correct some usual misunderstandings about these matters. There are so many shaky details in the Matlab SP toolbox (which I believe myself competent to critizise) that I'm reluctant to trust the routines in the toolboxes I don't know so much about. Rune
Reply by ●January 2, 20042004-01-02
allnor@tele.ntnu.no (Rune Allnor) wrote in message news:<f56893ae.0401020204.5be0bbb0@posting.google.com>...> the nominatorI think that should be numerator. Where's the dictionary when you need it? Rune
Reply by ●January 4, 20042004-01-04
ANDY wrote:> what can i do now?Andy, Although you cant do anything about people who read and copied it, you can retract it. It is possible (It works with Netscape) that you can simply select the message and hit the "delete" key. With Netscape, you can also use "Cancel message" in the "Edit" pull-down menu. There must be a similar way in other browsers. Jerry -- Engineering is the art of making what you want from things you can get. �����������������������������������������������������������������������
Reply by ●January 6, 20042004-01-06
Jerry Avins <jya@ieee.org> wrote in message news:<3ff8b09b$0$6761$61fed72c@news.rcn.com>...> ANDY wrote: > > > what can i do now? > > Andy, > > Although you cant do anything about people who read and copied it, you > can retract it. It is possible (It works with Netscape) that you can > simply select the message and hit the "delete" key. With Netscape, you > can also use "Cancel message" in the "Edit" pull-down menu. There must > be a similar way in other browsers.That will unlikely work. Generating cancel control messages in Usenet is no secret, but it is nearly impossible to convince news servers all over the world to honor the cancel messages. Thanks to abuses, most news servers (AOL being one, Google being two among those I know) simply reject any cancel messages. Andy can still try to "delete" the message so he can tell Mathworks "I am sorry but I have done everything I can. I will not post your codes again." And one advice for Andy. Copyrights and intellectual properties are serious in the western world. Some people criticize harshly on the excessive protection regarding these concepts, but in general it is still an honored concept. When you post a message with your school computer account (I believe you are a Xian Jiao Tung University student), please pay more attention because the fame of your school could be affected by your message. -- a lurker of comp.dsp who almost got turned away on the immigration discussion in the Sacramento job thread
