It was pointed out (more politely than one could have expected) that I miscalculated certain image frequencies. (I folded around the sampling frequency instead of around half of that, arriving at nonsense.) I've been wanting to acknowledge the correction and thank whoever sent it, but it's lost. Jerry -- Engineering is the art of making what you want from things you can get. �����������������������������������������������������������������������
I can't find the thread.
Started by ●December 23, 2003
Reply by ●December 23, 20032003-12-23
Jerry Avins wrote:> It was pointed out (more politely than one could have expected) that I > miscalculated certain image frequencies. (I folded around the sampling > frequency instead of around half of that, arriving at nonsense.) I've > been wanting to acknowledge the correction and thank whoever sent it, > but it's lost.Hey Jerry, It was me. The thread subject was "Frequency content of DAC". Thanks for the acknowledge! -- % Randy Yates % "...the answer lies within your soul %% Fuquay-Varina, NC % 'cause no one knows which side %%% 919-577-9882 % the coin will fall." %%%% <yates@ieee.org> % 'Big Wheels', *Out of the Blue*, ELO http://home.earthlink.net/~yatescr
