Hi to everyone, I've to calculate the SPL value of the waveform from the digital values of audio samples incoming from the audiocard (Echo Layla24). I get the audio sample buffer using Asio protocol. I can calculate the RMS value of buffer, but how can i calculate the SPL value?? Is there a way to obtain the SPL from RMS?? Thanks in advance!
RMS -> SPL
Started by ●October 16, 2003
Reply by ●October 16, 20032003-10-16
"Emanuele" <eman1975@libero.it> wrote in news:ivFjb.42076$vO5.1531943@twister1.libero.it:> Hi to everyone, > I've to calculate the SPL value of the waveform from the digital > values of audio samples incoming from the audiocard (Echo Layla24). I > get the audio sample buffer using Asio protocol. I can calculate the > RMS value of buffer, but how can i calculate the SPL value?? Is there > a way to obtain the SPL from RMS?? > > Thanks in advance! > > >To calculate the SPL (sound pressure level), you need to know the sensitivity of the transducer (mic?) and the gain structure of the soundcard. With a typical sound card this is sometimes more difficult than you think. The easiest way is to measure the output of a acoustical calibrator and compare. Often a weighting network is applied (A weighting is most common). The value is usually expressed in dB re 20uPa. -- Al Clark Danville Signal Processing, Inc. -------------------------------------------------------------------- Purveyors of Fine DSP Hardware and other Cool Stuff Available at http://www.danvillesignal.com
Reply by ●October 16, 20032003-10-16
"Al Clark" <dsp@danvillesignal.com> wrote in message news:Xns9416BBF1D4432aclarkdanvillesignal@66.133.130.30...> "Emanuele" <eman1975@libero.it> wrote in > news:ivFjb.42076$vO5.1531943@twister1.libero.it: > > > Hi to everyone, > > I've to calculate the SPL value of the waveform from the digital > > values of audio samples incoming from the audiocard (Echo Layla24). I > > get the audio sample buffer using Asio protocol. I can calculate the > > RMS value of buffer, but how can i calculate the SPL value?? Is there > > a way to obtain the SPL from RMS?? > > > > Thanks in advance! > > > > > > > > To calculate the SPL (sound pressure level), you need to know the > sensitivity of the transducer (mic?) and the gain structure of the > soundcard. With a typical sound card this is sometimes more difficult > than you think. The easiest way is to measure the output of a acoustical > calibrator and compare. > > Often a weighting network is applied (A weighting is most common). The > value is usually expressed in dB re 20uPa.The exact formula is SPL = 20*log10( RMS/(20e-6) ) where, RMS = SQRT(SUM( S1^2 + S2^2 + S3^2 + ... + Sn^2 )/N), where Si is the i-th sample of N samples. where Si are the values scaled according the the calibration factor you determine from above. This basically means you will need to decide on a time period (number of samples) to applied the RMS calculation to.
Reply by ●October 16, 20032003-10-16
"J" <j@n.c> wrote in message news:QbOdne-cGNZwyxKiRVn-sA@comcast.com...> > "Al Clark" <dsp@danvillesignal.com> wrote in message > news:Xns9416BBF1D4432aclarkdanvillesignal@66.133.130.30... > > > > Often a weighting network is applied (A weighting is most common). The > > value is usually expressed in dB re 20uPa. >I should add that it is preferred to A-weight a signal to make it relate better to perceived loudness (although there are more accurate weighting scheme A-weighting is a common standard in North America).
Reply by ●October 17, 20032003-10-17
"Al Clark" <dsp@danvillesignal.com> a �crit > | To calculate the SPL (sound pressure level), you need to know the | sensitivity of the transducer (mic?) and the gain structure of the | soundcard. With a typical sound card this is sometimes more difficult | than you think. The easiest way is to measure the output of a acoustical | calibrator and compare. | Often a weighting network is applied (A weighting is most common). The | value is usually expressed in dB re 20uPa. I agree. Computing A-weighting curve coefficients (for fixed point DSP) was not an easy task ! (but i succed with 4 biquads). I first compute RMS on a small time period then compute LEQ (mean(RMS)) on 1 second. I compute log(LEQ) value and add a calibration constant (depending on the pre-amplifiers) If you want to calculate SPL you should use a time-constant too when computing RMS (sound level meter usually displays fast or slow SPL) Am I wrong ? Bonne Chance ! :o) Curl
Reply by ●October 17, 20032003-10-17
"Curl" <Mr.Bilou@microsoft.fr> wrote in news:3f8fa6a2$0$27605 $626a54ce@news.free.fr:> > "Al Clark" <dsp@danvillesignal.com> a �crit > >| To calculate the SPL (sound pressure level), you need to know the >| sensitivity of the transducer (mic?) and the gain structure of the >| soundcard. With a typical sound card this is sometimes more > difficult >| than you think. The easiest way is to measure the output of a > acoustical >| calibrator and compare. >| Often a weighting network is applied (A weighting is most common). > The >| value is usually expressed in dB re 20uPa. > > I agree. > > Computing A-weighting curve coefficients (for fixed point DSP) was not > an easy task ! (but i succed with 4 biquads). > I first compute RMS on a small time period then compute LEQ > (mean(RMS)) on 1 second. > I compute log(LEQ) value and add a calibration constant (depending on > the pre-amplifiers) > > If you want to calculate SPL you should use a time-constant too when > computing RMS (sound level meter usually displays fast or slow SPL) > Am I wrong ? > > Bonne Chance ! :o) > Curl > > >Leq is a linear average and Fast (125ms) and Slow (1s) time constants refer to exponential averaging. Both are routinely used in acoustics measurements. I would be interested in your A Weight filter solution and approach. -- Al Clark Danville Signal Processing, Inc. -------------------------------------------------------------------- Purveyors of Fine DSP Hardware and other Cool Stuff Available at http://www.danvillesignal.com