One of the comments on the "VCO in a PLL" thread got me to thinking. I remember being struck by the similarity in the waterfall curves between FEC coding on the one hand, and FM radio on the other. One is in BER vs. Eb/No, and the other is in output SNR vs. input SNR, but both are showing that when you transmit a signal with redundant information you'll get improved performance up to some noise threshold, and after that things go to hell in a hurry. Get the right book, or pair of books, and look at one and then the other. Then allow yourself to be boggled by the similarities in the curves. There's something deep and philosophical in there, but I never managed to grab onto it. I do think it's amazing that Major Armstrong managed to INTUIT the advantages of frequency modulation at a time when most people were still fumbling around trying to understand how carrier-wave transmission worked. -- Tim Wescott Wescott Design Services http://www.wescottdesign.com
FM as "analog FEC"
Started by ●January 14, 2014
Reply by ●January 14, 20142014-01-14
Tim!!!!!! Yes i realized the same thing years ago. Wideband FM is a form of Analog FEC. FM is amazing. Mark
Reply by ●January 15, 20142014-01-15
makolber@yahoo.com writes:> Tim!!!!!! > > Yes i realized the same thing years ago. Wideband FM is a form of Analog FEC. > > FM is amazing."F --- M, no static at all"... -- Randy Yates Digital Signal Labs http://www.digitalsignallabs.com
Reply by ●January 15, 20142014-01-15
Tim Wescott <tim@seemywebsite.really> writes:> [...] > There's something deep and philosophical in there, but I never managed to > grab onto it.<LIKE> -- Randy Yates Digital Signal Labs http://www.digitalsignallabs.com