Hilbert Transforms, Analytic Signals and Analytic Functions

On Thu, 3 Mar 2005 18:36:45 -0500, "Clay S. Turner"
<Physics@Bellsouth.net> wrote:

>
>"Richard Webb" <webby@REMOVEMErichardwebb-online.co.uk> wrote in message 
>news:qoCdnYrml_iI5brfRVnytg@pipex.net...
>>    I've had an interest in the Hilbert transform since I had to implement
>> one in a project a few years ago (with a bit of help from Rick!). I 
>> haven't
>> looked at them since and your paper was a great refresher, it even taught 
>> me
>> a few things I either forgor or never knew!! For some reason a lot of text
>> books don't make the Hilbert transform easy to understand, usually because
>> of their use of language getting in the way of conveying the information. 
>> I
>> found your paper pitched at the right level!
>>
>> Rich.
>>
>>
>
>Thanks Rich,
> That's a great compliment. Writing is not my forte' - I'll leave that to 
>Rick Lyons. But I do try to cut through all of the stuff and distill out 
>what is important. I'm glad that this paper was at the right level for you. 
>Hopefully others will think the same.
>
>Again Thanks,
>Clay

Ha ha Clay.  You tickle me.
Your writing has four important characteristics.
It's gentle in approach, deliberate in delivery,
thorough in content, and ultimately readable.

I just glanced briefly at your material so far, 
but I found a silly little typo.
The sentence after Equation 24 has the words:
"the direction that taken by".

In any case, Good goin' Clay!

[-Rick-]