DSPRelated.com
Forums

All-Pass FIR

Started by John Phillips August 11, 2004
Allan Herriman wrote:

> On Thu, 12 Aug 2004 10:30:13 -0400, Jerry Avins <jya@ieee.org> wrote: > > >>Paul Russell wrote: >> >> >>>Frank wrote: >>> >>> >>>>>Coefficients for a three tap all-pass filter: >>>>> >>>>>0 1 0 >>>>> >>>>>What are the coefficients for a four tap, all-pass filter? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>0 1 0 0 >>>> >>> >>>0 0 1 0 works pretty good too, I hear. >>> >>>Paul >> >> >>0 0 0 1 and 1 0 0 0 complete the set. > > > 1 0 0 0 is the minimum phase version. Surely this would sound better > than 0 0 0 1. > > Regards, > Allan.
I guess so, but how much better depends on the sample rate. Jerry -- ... the worst possible design that just meets the specification - almost a definition of practical engineering. .. Chris Bore &#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;
John Phillips wrote:

> Thanks for all your comments, even the funny ones.
I hope it's clear to you that we directed the funny ones to one another. I hope the answers directly to you were straightforward and informative. Jerry -- ... the worst possible design that just meets the specification - almost a definition of practical engineering. .. Chris Bore &#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;
The thoughts and the jokes made me think and to get the answer that I
needed.  That is what counts plus I enjoyed the jokes.
Thanks again,

John


"Jerry Avins" <jya@ieee.org> wrote in message
news:411cd331$0$5904$61fed72c@news.rcn.com...
> John Phillips wrote: > > > Thanks for all your comments, even the funny ones. > > I hope it's clear to you that we directed the funny ones to one another. > I hope the answers directly to you were straightforward and informative. > > Jerry > -- > ... the worst possible design that just meets the specification - almost > a definition of practical engineering. .. Chris Bore > &#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295; >
"John Phillips" <jsp5646@hotmail.com> wrote in news:ZPdTc.192847
$tH1.9754504@twister.southeast.rr.com:

> The thoughts and the jokes made me think and to get the answer that I > needed. That is what counts plus I enjoyed the jokes. > Thanks again, > > John > >
Jokes? Randy is an audiophile. I'm sure he has being quite serious. Al Clark
> "Jerry Avins" <jya@ieee.org> wrote in message > news:411cd331$0$5904$61fed72c@news.rcn.com... >> John Phillips wrote: >> >> > Thanks for all your comments, even the funny ones. >> >> I hope it's clear to you that we directed the funny ones to one
another.
>> I hope the answers directly to you were straightforward and
informative.
>> >> Jerry >> -- >> ... the worst possible design that just meets the specification -
almost
>> a definition of practical engineering. .. Chris
Bore
>>
&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;&#4294967295;
>> > > >
-- Al Clark Danville Signal Processing, Inc. -------------------------------------------------------------------- Purveyors of Fine DSP Hardware and other Cool Stuff Available at http://www.danvillesignal.com