I was once asked over a telephonic interview what the sampling rate of a square wave.. What would be the best answer for this.
Sampling Rate of Square Wave
Started by ●October 5, 2006
Reply by ●October 5, 20062006-10-05
Hi, I'd answer that it is impossible to sample a square wave perfectly, since the harmonics spread out to infinity. Nevertheless, one could define a suitable border for the harmonic frequencies to include, low-pass-filter the square signal from this upper border, then sample with at least 2.56 this frequency to avoid aliasing and get a sampled version of a more or less rounded-shape-square wave. The more frequencies you include the closer you get the perfect infinitely steep transitions of the rectangular form. By second thought, if you don't need a sampled version of an "analog square wave" (I wonder if this exists in reality) but have to sample a already digital signal with defined clock frequency you just sample at this clocks frequency and get a zero or one every time. From this you can redefine the digital signal exactly. But I guess they wanted you to answer the first version. Did you get the job? Would I? :-) Greetings stereo vinbng wrote:> I was once asked over a telephonic interview what the sampling rate of a > square wave.. What would be the best answer for this.
Reply by ●October 8, 20062006-10-08
stereo wrote:> I'd answer that it is impossible to sample a square wave perfectly, > since the harmonics spread out to infinity. Nevertheless, one couldObviously this is a problem if the signal is not bandlimited, and also unknown. But here, the signal is known to be a square wave !! Let's assume we don't know its fundamental frequency, amplitude, and phase (relative to some point t0), and that we do know its duty-cycle is 50%. Consider the following: If we are allowed to perform/gather an arbitrarily large number of samples (N -> inf), then it's possible to estimate the unknown parameters (frequency, amplitude, phase), with very high accuracy, even if we sample below the Nyquist rate of the fundamental frequency (!!), when we do NOT use an anti-aliasing filter. The more samples we're allowed to take, the higher the accuracy of estimation.
Reply by ●October 11, 20062006-10-11