Seems to be a need for such. Some people use Ethernet, but that was never meant to be used for strict real time purposes. Any ideas about what the future might hold, or what needs to be developed? I have been attracted to the Gibson Guitar company's idea. http://www.gibson.com/DigitalGuitarNew/gibsonDigital.html http://www.gibson.com/Products/Audio/MaGIC%20%282%29/ Any ideas or news about what is happening? Any thoughts about going to OFDM for an Audio Video Network? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orthogonal_frequency-division_multiplexing http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multimedia_over_Coax_Alliance Any thoughts? ************** Come Join: http://groups.google.com/group/realtime_signal_and_control
Digital Audio and Video Networks
Started by ●February 9, 2007
Reply by ●February 9, 20072007-02-09
frank.agee@gmail.com wrote:> Seems to be a need for such.Seems to be not much need for such.> Some people use Ethernet, but that was > never meant to be used for strict real time purposes. > Any ideas about what the future might hold, or what needs to be > developed? > > I have been attracted to the Gibson Guitar company's idea.Just another still born multimedia transport. There have been many multimedia transports like that introduced already. MOST, Cobranet... There are technical as well as non-technical reasons why none of them made it.> Any ideas or news about what is happening?Nothing is happening.> Any thoughts about going to OFDM for an Audio Video Network?There is absolutely no relation between the physical layer and the transport protocol. Vladimir Vassilevsky DSP and Mixed Signal Design Consultant http://www.abvolt.com
Reply by ●February 11, 20072007-02-11
> > Just another still born multimedia transport. There have been many > multimedia transports like that introduced already. MOST, Cobranet... > There are technical as well as non-technical reasons why none of them > made it. > > > Any ideas or news about what is happening? > > Nothing is happening. > > > Any thoughts about going to OFDM for an Audio Video Network? > > There is absolutely no relation between the physical layer and the > transport protocol. >How do you know the Gibson system is still born? There would seem to be a great deal of interest in audio/video networks. As I see it, my question is do you want to use OFDM for something that is wired, like HomePlug for example.
Reply by ●February 11, 20072007-02-11
frank.agee@gmail.com wrote:>> Just another still born multimedia transport. There have been many >> multimedia transports like that introduced already. MOST, Cobranet... >> There are technical as well as non-technical reasons why none of them >> made it. >> >>> Any ideas or news about what is happening? >> Nothing is happening. >> >>> Any thoughts about going to OFDM for an Audio Video Network? >> There is absolutely no relation between the physical layer and the >> transport protocol. >> > > How do you know the Gibson system is still born? There would seem to > be a great deal of interest in audio/video networks. As I see it, my > question is do you want to use OFDM for something that is wired, like > HomePlug for example.Are there any wires with fading channels? Jerry -- Engineering is the art of making what you want from things you can get. ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯