Equations of Motion for Rigid Bodies
We are now ready to write down the general equations of motion for
rigid bodies in terms of for the center of mass and
for the rotation of the body about its center of mass.
As discussed above, it is useful to decompose the motion of a rigid body into
- (1)
- the linear velocity
of its center of mass, and
- (2)
- its angular velocity
about its center of mass.
The linear motion is governed by Newton's second law
, where
is the total mass,
is the
velocity of the center-of-mass, and
is the sum of all external
forces on the rigid body. (Equivalently,
is the sum of the
radial force components pointing toward or away from the center of
mass.) Since this is so straightforward, essentially no harder than
dealing with a point mass, we will not consider it further.
The angular motion is governed the rotational version of Newton's second law introduced in §B.4.19:
where






The driving torque
is given by the resultant moment of
the external forces, using Eq.
(B.27) for each external force to
obtain its contribution to the total moment. In other words, the
external moments (tangential forces times moment arms) sum up for the
net torque just like the radial force components summed to produce the
net driving force on the center of mass.
Body-Fixed and Space-Fixed Frames of Reference
Rotation is always about some (instantaneous) axis of rotation that is
free to change over time. It is convenient to express rotations in a
coordinate system having its origin (
) located at the
center-of-mass of the rigid body (§B.4.1), and its coordinate axes
aligned along the principal directions for the body (§B.4.16).
This body-fixed frame then moves within a stationary
space-fixed frame (or ``star frame'').
In Eq.(B.29) above, we wrote down Newton's second law for angular
motion in the body-fixed frame, i.e., the coordinate system
having its origin at the center of mass. Furthermore, it is simplest
(
is diagonal) when its axes lie along principal directions
(§B.4.16).
As an example of a local body-fixed coordinate system, consider a spinning top. In the body-fixed frame, the ``vertical'' axis coincides with the top's axis of rotation (spin). As the top loses rotational kinetic energy due to friction, the top's rotation-axis precesses around a circle, as observed in the space-fixed frame. The other two body-fixed axes can be chosen as any two mutually orthogonal axes intersecting each other (and the spin axis) at the center of mass, and lying in the plane orthogonal to the spin axis. The space-fixed frame is of course that of the outside observer's inertial frameB.28in which the top is spinning.
Angular Motion in the Space-Fixed Frame
Let's now consider angular motion in the presence of linear motion of the center of mass. In general, we have [270]





Euler's Equations for Rotations in the Body-Fixed Frame
Suppose now that the body-fixed frame is rotating in the space-fixed
frame with angular velocity
. Then the total torque on the rigid
body becomes [270]
Similarly, the total external forces on the center of mass become



![$\displaystyle \underline{L}\eqsp \left[\begin{array}{c} I_1\omega_1 \\ [2pt] I_2\omega_2 \\ [2pt] I_3\omega_3\end{array}\right]
$](http://www.dsprelated.com/josimages_new/pasp/img2969.png)



Substituting this result into Eq.(B.30), we obtain the following
equations of angular motion for an object rotating in the body-fixed
frame defined by its three principal axes of rotation:

These are call Euler's
equations:B.29Since these equations are in the body-fixed frame, is the mass
moment of inertia about principal axis
, and
is the
angular velocity about principal axis
.
Examples
For a uniform sphere, the cross-terms disappear and the moments of
inertia are all the same, leaving
, for
.
Since any three orthogonal vectors can serve as eigenvectors of the
moment of inertia tensor, we have that, for a uniform sphere, any
three orthogonal axes can be chosen as principal axes.
For a cylinder that is not spinning about its axis, we similarly
obtain two uncoupled equations
, for
, given
(no spin). Note, however, that if we replace the
circular cross-section of the cylinder by an ellipse, then
and there is a coupling term that drives
(unless
happens to cancel it).
Next Section:
Young's Modulus
Previous Section:
Newton's Second Law for Rotations