|
Shyju wrote: >Continuing our discussion about RTDX and chip version... >I will list my findings.. > >1.I tried the software version for getting the Rev Id- that is >CHIP_getRevId() CSL function on my C6416 chip .. which returned 1. More over >the return value of the the CSL call is of unsigned int which cannot take a >floating value(if chip is of ver 1.1 how it is reflected?). I have tried >the CSL call on a 6201evm PCI ver (PC-P-86M-94V-0 ) which supports RTDX >returned the value 2.. >2.C6416 chip can be detected only using CCS2.2 and using sdgo6400_11 driver >which is supporting RTDX. >3.It is written TMS320C6416GLZ > D11 - 32A2YEW > 2002 TI 62 >My doubts are whether any of this findings cofirms that this chip is of >PG1.1 silicon? If yes why the chip is not supporting RTDX? Please explain >it... From your chip markings you have 1.1 silicon. My chip also says D11 and I have used RTDX on it with XDS510 and XDS560 emulators. You should probably contact Spectum Digital who makes the XDS510PP emulator and make sure RTDX really is supported for C64x, make sure you have the right drivers and directions on hwe to properly install them in CCS 2.2 . /Regards, P Ligander >Thanks in adance... >Shyju >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Andrew Elder" <> >To: <> >Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 7:44 PM >Subject: RE: [c6x] RTDX problem > > >>Also, FYI a call to CSL function CHIP_getRevId() will do the trick. >>The hardware way (below) is much simpler ! >> >>- Andrew E. >> >> >>At 10:22 AM 6/6/2003 +0200, Jean-Michel MERCIER wrote: >> >> >> >>>2 ways to identifiy silicon revision >>> >>>- The software way : >>> * If you are using CCS 2.1x, then it is a 1.0x silicon revision >>> * If you are using CCS 2.2x, you have a different driver >>> for v1.0x and v1.1. So as said by Par, depending on which >>> driver works for you, you will now the revision >>> >>>- The hardware way : it is simply written on >>> the DSP >>> The 1st line of the DSP should be something like TMS320C6415GLZ >>> The 2nd line should be D103 - <numbers> >>> This is a 1.03 silicon >>> v1.1 silicon have <letter>11 marking at the start of the 2nd line >>> >>> >>> Jean-Michel MERCIER >>> >>>-- >>>dsp & imaging - www.ateme.com >>>ATEME - 26 Burospace - 91573 BIEVRES >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>>-----Message d'origine----- >>>>De : Par Ligander [mailto:] >>>>Envoy: vendredi 6 juin 2003 08:31 >>>>: Shyju >>>>Cc : ; >>>>Objet : Re: [c6x] RTDX problem >>>> >>>> >>>>Shyju wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>Thanks for the fast response from P Ligander & Jeff Brower >>>>>I have tried RTDX in 6416 TEB from TI and also the board we >>>>> >>>>> >>>>designed using >>>> >>>> >>>>>C6416( Part no TMS32C6416DGLZ6E3).How do I know the core is >>>>> >>>>> >>>>PG1.1 silicon ? >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>http://focus.ti.com/lit/er/sprz011j/sprz011j.pdf >>>>Section 1.2 Revision Identifiaction >>>> >>>>Also, in CCS setup you should be using >>>>"C64xx Rev 1.1 XDS5x0......." >>>> >>>>/Regards, P Ligander >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>Pls clarify. The C6x series is more exiting with it's uncaomparable >>>>>features. But As a biginner I do have some difficulties in getting >>>>> >>>>> >alonmg >>>>>with C6416. Can any one send me any tutorial/Workshop material/ >>>>> >>>>> >>>>or any good >>>> >>>> >>>>>pdfs on these. Now I am exploring the examples of the CCS studio. >>>>> Thanks once again. Ur suggestions are very important to me... >>>>> >>>>>Shyju P.V >>>>>ERDCI >>>>> >>>>>----- Original Message ----- >>>>>From: "P Ligander" <> >>>>>To: "Shyju" <> >>>>>Cc: <> >>>>>Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 12:37 AM >>>>>Subject: Re: [c6x] RTDX problem >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>Are you using PG1.1 silicon ? It is requiered for RTDX... >>>>>> >>>>>>/Regards, P Ligander >>>>>> >>>>>>Shyju wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>Hello friends , >>>>>>> I am new to C6x as well as to this group. I am working on c6416 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >and >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>c6201 of TI with CCS 2.2.I had few prblem and I have described >>>>> >>>>> >>>>it here. Hope >>>> >>>> >>>>>any one will answer my questions. A hi to all the group members.... >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>> I have tried our programs in TMS3206416 TEB with code composer >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>version 2.2. I have downloaded the drivers of XDS510PP for CCS 2.2 >>>>> >>>>> >from >>>>>Spectrum Digital's website. We tried the programs in the >>>>> >>>>> >>>>tutorial section of >>>> >>>> >>>>>CCS. Even if they are working fine we can not see the EXE graph , STS >>>>>details and LOG in real time. For seeing all those things either >>>>> >>>>> >>>>we have to >>>> >>>> >>>>>put a break point on the loop of execution or else we have to perform >>>>> >>>>> >the >>>>>step through. Although in the Volume 4 example we can not create >>>>> >>>>> >>>>a Channel >>>> >>>> >>>>>for real time data transfer with target. We have tried this in TI TEB >>>>> >>>>> >and >>>>>our board which uses the TMS3206416 DSP (Part no >>>>> >>>>> >>>>TMS32C6416DGLZ6E3). However >>>> >>>> >>>>>these programs are working in the 6201 TEB and we are getting >>>>> >>>>> >>>>EXE graph and >>>> >>>> >>>>>other things while the target is running.. We think the problem >>>>> >>>>> >>>>is with the >>>> >>>> >>>>>6416 chip. If we put break point in our program it spoils the >>>>> >>>>> >>>>very purpose >>>> >>>> >>>>>of RTDX. Since our design is based on C6416 it is a serious >>>>> >>>>> >>>>problem as far >>>> >>>> >>>>>as we are concerned.Pls! >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>give us a clear answer to this . >>>>>>> >>>>>>>The programs we tried are... >>>>>>>Volume 1, 2,3,4 of the tutorial folder of CCS. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Doubts are.. >>>>>>>1. In order to get the data from C6416 is it mandatory to pass it >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>through the break point.(Remember break point halts the target >>>>> >>>>> >>>>for the data >>>> >>>> >>>>>transfer to the host and refreshing all the windows related to CCS) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>2. If RTDX is possible with C6416 can anyone gimme a simple code >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >which >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>demonstrate the same.( Both host side and target side) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>Best Regards, >>>>>>> >>>>>>>"You are not beaten until you admit it." -- George S. Patton, >>>>>>>Jr. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>_____________________________________ >>Note: If you do a simple "reply" with your email client, only the author >> >> >of this message will receive your answer. You need to do a "reply all" if >you want your answer to be distributed to the entire group. >>_____________________________________ >>About this discussion group: >> >>To Join: Send an email to >> >>To Post: Send an email to >> >>To Leave: Send an email to >> >>Archives: http://www.yahoogroups.com/group/c6x >> >>Other Groups: http://www.dsprelated.com >> >> >>">http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ >> >> >> > >______________________________________ >Scanned and protected by Email scanner >_____________________________________ >Note: If you do a simple "reply" with your email client, only the author of this message will receive your answer. You need to do a "reply all" if you want your answer to be distributed to the entire group. > >_____________________________________ >About this discussion group: > >To Join: Send an email to > >To Post: Send an email to > >To Leave: Send an email to > >Archives: http://www.yahoogroups.com/group/c6x > >Other Groups: http://www.dsprelated.com >">http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > > |
Re: RTDX problem
Started by ●June 19, 2003
