On Thu, 9 Aug 2012 17:52:06 -0700 (PDT), Robert Adams <robert.adams@analog.com> wrote:>I tend to visualize the sampling theory as a convolution where the spectrum= > of the sampling sequence (regularly spaced sticks) is convolved with the s= >pectrum of the analog signal, which is double-sided if the signal is real. = >Therefore you need a sample rate 2*fmax to avoid any aliasing. However if y= >ou clear out one half of the signal spectrum by making it an analytic signa= >l, you can make the sample-rate equal to fmax without any aliasing. This i= >s a nice visual that allows me to avoid math, since all the math fell out o= >f my head around 1980 as far as I can tell. > >So I think the mistake the OP made was to assume that a signal is analytic = >just because it's complex. While all analytic signals are complex, not all = >complex signals are analytic. > > >Bob >That's a good way of thinking about it that hadn't occurred to me. I may steal that. ;) Eric Jacobsen Anchor Hill Communications www.anchorhill.com
Sampling Complex Signal
Started by ●August 5, 2012
Reply by ●August 9, 20122012-08-09
Reply by ●August 10, 20122012-08-10
Robert Adams <robert.adams@analog.com> writes:> [...] > This is a nice visual that allows me to avoid math, since all the math > fell out of my head around 1980 as far as I can tell."Fell out of my head?" ... LOL! -- Randy Yates Digital Signal Labs http://www.digitalsignallabs.com
Reply by ●August 11, 20122012-08-11
On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 23:32:40 -0400, Randy Yates <yates@digitalsignallabs.com> wrote:>Robert Adams <robert.adams@analog.com> writes: >> [...] >> This is a nice visual that allows me to avoid math, since all the math >> fell out of my head around 1980 as far as I can tell. > >"Fell out of my head?" ... LOL!Hi Randy, In technical terms, isn't that called "overflow"? [-Rick-]