DSPRelated.com
Forums

[OT] New GNU Octave group

Started by Himanshu May 11, 2006
Dear all!!

I was first introduced to GNU Octave through DSP guru. I found it to be
wonderful software but I don't think any of us are using it. Most of
DSP people seen to use MATLAB.

If MATLAB can do it, I think GNU Octave has it all to do it too. People
at comp.dsp are great! I have always benefitted from them. I need one
little help, please give Octave a try. Lets start improving its signal
processing  side.

I am not experienced much in DSP but you people are. That's why I
thought posting it here.

If you agree with me and you are an Octave user please join the group
at
http://groups.google.com/groups/dsp-octave.

Any flames are also invited here! :-)

Warm regards
--Himanshu

Oops!! wrong link!!
right one is
http://groups.google.com/group/dsp-octave

"Himanshu" <hs.chauhan@gmail.com> writes:

> Oops!! wrong link!! > right one is > http://groups.google.com/group/dsp-octave
Is this an ordinary usenet group, or is it something local to google? Asbj&#4294967295;rn -- Asbj&#4294967295;rn S&#4294967295;b&#4294967295; Q2S - Centre for Quantifiable Quality of Service in Communication Systems http://www.q2s.ntnu.no/~asbjs/
On 11 May 2006 16:24:43 +0200, Asbj&#4294967295;rn S&#4294967295;b&#4294967295; wrote:

> "Himanshu" <hs.chauhan@gmail.com> writes: > >> Oops!! wrong link!! >> right one is >> http://groups.google.com/group/dsp-octave > > > Is this an ordinary usenet group, or is it something local to google? > > Asbj&#4294967295;rn
The last time I looked, Octave was horribly wrinkled with age. Not much update work being done. OTOH, Scilab is very interesting, although not a direct Matlab replacement.
Himanshu wrote:
> Dear all!! > > I was first introduced to GNU Octave through DSP guru. I found it to be > wonderful software but I don't think any of us are using it. Most of > DSP people seen to use MATLAB. > > If MATLAB can do it, I think GNU Octave has it all to do it too. People > at comp.dsp are great! I have always benefitted from them. I need one > little help, please give Octave a try. Lets start improving its signal > processing side. > > I am not experienced much in DSP but you people are. That's why I > thought posting it here. > > If you agree with me and you are an Octave user please join the group > at > http://groups.google.com/groups/dsp-octave. > > Any flames are also invited here! :-) > > Warm regards > --Himanshu >
Ah. But anything MatLab can do from the command line SciLab can do better. Differently, but IMHO better. SciLab also has a graphical system builder similar to Simulink, but the editor could use some work. -- Tim Wescott Wescott Design Services http://www.wescottdesign.com Posting from Google? See http://cfaj.freeshell.org/google/ "Applied Control Theory for Embedded Systems" came out in April. See details at http://www.wescottdesign.com/actfes/actfes.html
Its not a usenet groups. Its something local to google.
> > > Ah. But anything MatLab can do from the command line SciLab can do > better. Differently, but IMHO better. > > SciLab also has a graphical system builder similar to Simulink, but the > editor could use some work. >
I didn't say that Octave does is better. I just want to point out that Octave has it all to do it. And I admit that Octave seriously needs some attention from us to be a better system. If we give our love to Octave, it will slowly nourish into a young but mature signal processing environment. Ain't it? regards --Himanshu
Google
Error


    Not Found
    The requested URL /groups/dsp-octave was not found on this server.



--RY

Apparently "dsp-octave" is not a usenet news group. I
do not support the use of non-usenet forums.

If you want me to participate, make a usenet
news group. 

--RY

PS: I *am* using octave and I *do* like it.

--Randy

On 2006-05-11, Himanshu <hs.chauhan@gmail.com> wrote:
> If MATLAB can do it, I think GNU Octave has it all to do it too. People > at comp.dsp are great! I have always benefitted from them. I need one > little help, please give Octave a try. Lets start improving its signal > processing side.
Plain Octave lacks a lot of useful signal processing functions, but you can get them in octave-forge, which is a library addition to Octave. -- Ben Jackson <ben@ben.com> http://www.ben.com/
Yes I agree that dsp-octave is not a usenet group. Randy you are very
experienced and ofcourse I would like you to participate. But I am
sorry, that I don't have idea to to how to create a new usenet group.
Any link would be of help. Currently I am using the newsfeed.vmunix.org
as my news server.