#### Two-PolePartial Fraction Expansion

Note that every real two-pole resonator can be broken up into a sum of two complex one-pole resonators:  (B.7)

where and are constants (generally complex). In this parallel one-pole'' form, it can be seen that the peak gain is no longer equal to the resonance gain, since each one-pole frequency response is tilted'' near resonance by being summed with the skirt'' of the other one-pole resonator, as illustrated in Fig.B.9. This interaction between the positive- and negative-frequency poles is minimized by making the resonance sharper ( ), and by separating the pole frequencies . The greatest separation occurs when the resonance frequency is at one-fourth the sampling rate ( ). However, low-frequency resonances, which are by far the most common in audio work, suffer from significant overlapping of the positive- and negative-frequency poles. To show Eq. (B.7) is always true, let's solve in general for and given and . Recombining the right-hand side over a common denominator and equating numerators gives which implies The solution is easily found to be where we have assumed im , as necessary to have a resonator in the first place. Breaking up the two-pole real resonator into a parallel sum of two complex one-pole resonators is a simple example of a partial fraction expansion (PFE) (discussed more fully in §6.8). Note that the inverse z transform of a sum of one-pole transfer functions can be easily written down by inspection. In particular, the impulse response of the PFE of the two-pole resonator (see Eq. (B.7)) is clearly Since is real, we must have , as we found above without assuming it. If , then is a real sinusoid created by the sum of two complex sinusoids spinning in opposite directions on the unit circle.
Next Section:
Exercise
Previous Section:
Resonator Bandwidth in Terms of Pole Radius