Gaussian Windowed Chirps (Chirplets)
As discussed in §G.8.2, an interesting generalization of sinusoidal modeling is chirplet modeling. A chirplet is defined as a Gaussian-windowed sinusoid, where the sinusoid has a constant amplitude, but its frequency may be linearly ``sweeping.'' This definition arises naturally from the mathematical fact that the Fourier transform of a Gaussian-windowed chirp signal is a complex Gaussian pulse, where a chirp signal is defined as a sinusoid having linearly modulated frequency, i.e., quadratic phase:
Applying a Gaussian window to this chirp yields
where . It is thus clear how naturally Gaussian amplitude envelopes and linearly frequency-sweeping sinusoids (chirps) belong together in a unified form called a chirplet.
The basic chirplet can be regarded as an exponential polynomial signal in which the polynomial is of order 2. Exponential polynomials of higher order have also been explored [89,90,91]. (See also §G.8.2.)
This result is valid when is complex. Writing in terms of real variables and as
That is, for complex, is a chirplet (Gaussian-windowed chirp). We see that the chirp oscillation frequency is zero at time . Therefore, for signal modeling applications, we typically add in an arbitrary frequency offset at time 0, as described in the next section.
This is proved in §B.6 as the dual of the shift-theorem. It is also evident from inspection of the Fourier transform:
Applying the modulation theorem to the Gaussian transform pair above yields
Thus, we frequency-shift a Gaussian chirp in the same way we frequency-shift any signal--by complex modulation (multiplication by a complex sinusoid at the shift-frequency).
The log magnitude Fourier transform is given by
and the phase is
Note that both log-magnitude and (unwrapped) phase are parabolas in .
In practice, it is simple to estimate the curvature at a spectral peak using parabolic interpolation:
We can write
Note that the window ``amplitude-rate'' is always positive. The ``chirp rate'' may be positive (increasing frequency) or negative (downgoing chirps). For purposes of chirp-rate estimation, there is no need to find the true spectral peak because the curvature is the same for all . However, curvature estimates are generally more reliable near spectral peaks, where the signal-to-noise ratio is typically maximum. In practice, we can form an estimate of from the known FFT analysis window (typically ``close to Gaussian'').
Chirplet Frequency-Rate Estimation
The chirp rate may be estimated from the relation as follows:
denote the measured (or known) curvature at the
midpoint of the analysis window
averages of the measured curvatures
along the log-magnitude and phase of a spectral peak,
- Then the chirp-rate
estimate may be estimated from the
spectral peak by
fs = 8000; x = chirp([0:1/fs:0.1],1000,1,2000); M = length(x); n=(-(M-1)/2:(M-1)/2)'; w = exp(-n.*n./(2*sigma.*sigma)); xw = w(:) .* x(:);
Figure 10.25 shows the same chirplet in a time-frequency plot. Figure 10.26 shows the spectrum of the example chirplet. Note the parabolic fits to dB magnitude and unwrapped phase. We see that phase modeling is most accurate where magnitude is substantial. If the signal were not truncated in the time domain, the parabolic fits would be perfect. Figure 10.27 shows the spectrum of a Gaussian-windowed chirp in which frequency decreases from 1 kHz to 500 Hz. Note how the curvature of the phase at the peak has changed sign.
FFT Filter Banks
Time Scale Modification