Rectangular Window Side-Lobes
From Fig.3.3 and Eq.
(3.4), we see that the
main-lobe width is
radian, and the
side-lobe level is 13 dB down.
Since the DTFT of the rectangular window approximates the
sinc
function (see (3.4)), which has an amplitude envelope
proportional to
(see (3.7)), it should ``roll
off'' at approximately 6 dB per octave (since
). This is verified in the log-log
plot of Fig.3.6.
As the sampling rate approaches infinity, the rectangular window
transform (
) converges exactly to the
sinc
function.
Therefore, the departure of the roll-off from that of the
sinc
function can be ascribed to aliasing in the frequency domain,
due to sampling in the time domain (hence the name ``
'').
Note that each side lobe has width
, as
measured between zero crossings.4.3 The main lobe, on the other hand, is
width
. Thus, in principle, we should never confuse
side-lobe peaks with main-lobe peaks, because a peak must be at least
wide in order to be considered ``real''. However, in
complicated real-world scenarios, side-lobes can still cause
estimation errors (``bias''). Furthermore, two sinusoids at closely
spaced frequencies and opposite phase can partially cancel each
other's main lobes, making them appear to be narrower than
.
In summary, the DTFT of the
-sample rectangular window is
proportional to the `aliased sinc function':
![\begin{eqnarray*}
\hbox{asinc}_M(\omega) &\isdef & \frac{\sin(\omega M / 2)}{M\cdot\sin(\omega/2)} \\ [0.2in]
&\approx& \frac{\sin(\pi fM)}{M\pi f} \isdefs \mbox{sinc}(fM)
\end{eqnarray*}](http://www.dsprelated.com/josimages_new/sasp2/img347.png)
Thus, it has zero crossings at integer multiples of
![]() |
(4.11) |
Its main-lobe width is



Next Section:
Rectangular Window Summary
Previous Section:
Zero-Phase Zero Padding