## Series and Parallel Filter Sections

In many situations it is better to implement a digital filter in terms of first- and/or second-order*elementary sections*, either in

*series*or in

*parallel*. In particular, such an implementation may have numerical advantages. In the time-varying case, it is easier to control fundamental parameters of small sections, such as pole frequencies, by means of coefficient variations.

### Series Second-Order Sections

For many filter types, such as lowpass, highpass, and bandpass filters, a good choice of implementation structure is often*series second-order sections*. In fixed-point applications, the ordering of the sections can be important. The matlab function

`tf2sos`

^{10.5}converts from ``transfer function form'', , to series ``second-order-section'' form. For example, the line

BAMatrix = tf2sos(B,A);converts the real filter specified by polynomial vectors

`B`and

`A`to a series of second-order sections (biquads) specified by the rows of

`BAMatrix`. Each row of

`BAMatrix`is of the form . The function

`tf2sos`may be implemented simply as a call to

`tf2zp`followed by a call to

`zp2sos`, where the

`zp`form of a digital filter consists of its (possibly complex) zeros, poles, and an overall gain factor:

function [sos,g] = tf2sos(B,A) [z,p,g]=tf2zp(B(:)',A(:)'); % Direct form to (zeros,poles,gain) sos=zp2sos(z,p,g); % (z,p,g) to series second-order sections

#### Matlab Example

The following matlab example expands the filterB=[1 0 0 0 0 1]; A=[1 0 0 0 0 .9]; [sos,g] = tf2sos(B,A) sos = 1.00000 0.61803 1.00000 1.00000 0.60515 0.95873 1.00000 -1.61803 1.00000 1.00000 -1.58430 0.95873 1.00000 1.00000 -0.00000 1.00000 0.97915 -0.00000 g = 1The

`g`parameter is an input (or output) scale factor; for this filter, it was not needed. Thus, in this example we obtained the following filter factorization:

`tf2sos`,

`tf2zp`, and

`zp2sos`discussed above, there are also functions

`sos2zp`and

`sos2tf`, which do the obvious conversion in both Matlab and Octave.

^{10.6}The

`sos2tf`function can be used to check that the second-order factorization is accurate:

% Numerically challenging "clustered roots" example: [B,A] = zp2tf(ones(10,1),0.9*ones(10,1),1); [sos,g] = tf2sos(B,A); [Bh,Ah] = sos2tf(sos,g); format long; disp(sprintf('Relative L2 numerator error: %g',... norm(Bh-B)/norm(B))); % Relative L2 numerator error: 1.26558e-15 disp(sprintf('Relative L2 denominator error: %g',... norm(Ah-A)/norm(A))); % Relative L2 denominator error: 1.65594e-15Thus, in this test, the original direct-form filter is compared with one created from the second-order sections. Such checking should be done for high-order filters, or filters having many poles and/or zeros close together, because the polynomial factorization used to find the poles and zeros can fail numerically. Moreover, the stability of the factors should be checked individually.

### Parallel First and/or Second-Order Sections

Instead of breaking up a filter into a*series*of second-order sections, as discussed in the previous section, we can break the filter up into a

*parallel sum*of first and/or second-order sections. Parallel sections are based directly on the

*partial fraction expansion*(PFE) of the filter transfer function discussed in §6.8. As discussed in §6.8.3, there is additionally an

*FIR part*when the order of the transfer-function denominator does not exceed that of the numerator (

*i.e.*, when the transfer function is not

*strictly proper*). The most general case of a PFE, valid for any finite-order transfer function, was given by Eq.(6.19), repeated here for convenience:

where denotes the number of distinct poles, and denotes the multiplicity of the th pole. The polynomial is the transfer function of the FIR part, as discussed in §6.8.3. The FIR part is typically realized as a tapped delay line, as shown in Fig.5.5.

#### First-Order Complex Resonators

For distinct poles, the recursive terms in the complete partial fraction expansion of Eq.(9.2) can be realized as a parallel sum of*complex*one-pole filter sections, thereby producing a

*parallel complex resonator*filter bank. Complex resonators are efficient for processing complex input signals, and they are especially easy to work with. Note that a complex resonator bank is similarly obtained by implementing a diagonalized state-space model [Eq.(G.22)].

#### Real Second-Order Sections

In practice, however, signals are typically real-valued functions of time. As a result, for real filters (§5.1), it is typically more efficient computationally to combine complex-conjugate one-pole sections together to form real second-order sections (two poles and one zero each, in general). This process was discussed in §6.8.1, and the resulting transfer function of each second-order section becomeswhere is one of the poles, and is its corresponding residue. This is a special case of the

*biquad section*discussed in §B.1.6. When the two poles of a real second-order section are complex, they form a complex-conjugate pair,

*i.e.*, they are located at in the plane, where is the modulus of either pole, and is the angle of either pole. In this case, the ``resonance-tuning coefficient'' in Eq.(9.3) can be expressed as

#### Implementation of Repeated Poles

Fig.9.5 illustrates an efficient implementation of terms due to a repeated pole with multiplicity three, contributing the additive terms### Formant Filtering Example

In*speech synthesis*[27,39], digital filters are often used to simulate

*formant filtering*by the vocal tract. It is well known [23] that the different

*vowel sounds*of speech can be simulated by passing a ``buzz source'' through a only two or three formant filters. As a result, speech is fully intelligible through the telephone bandwidth (nominally only 200-3200 Hz). A

*formant*is a

*resonance*in the voice spectrum. A single formant may thus be modeled using one

*biquad*(second-order filter section). For example, in the vowel as in ``father,'' the first three formant center-frequencies have been measured near 700, 1220, and 2600 Hz, with half-power bandwidths

^{10.7}130, 70, and 160 Hz [40]. In principle, the formant filter sections are in

*series*, as can be found by deriving the transfer function of an acoustic tube [48]. As a consequence, the vocal-tract transfer function is an all-pole filter (provided that the nasal tract is closed off or negligible). As a result, there is no need to specify

*gains*for the formant resonators--only center-frequency and bandwidth are necessary to specify each formant, leaving only an overall scale factor unspecified in a cascade (series) formant filter bank. Numerically, however, it makes more sense to implement disjoint resonances in

*parallel*rather than in series.

^{10.8}This is because when one formant filter is resonating, the others will be attenuating, so that to achieve a particular peak-gain at resonance, the resonating filter must overcome all combined attenuations as well as applying its own gain. In fixed-point arithmetic, this can result in large quantization-noise gains, especially for the last resonator in the chain. As a result of these considerations, our example will implement the formant sections in parallel. This means we must find the appropriate biquad

*numerators*so that when added together, the overall transfer-function numerator is a constant. This will be accomplished using the

*partial fraction expansion*(§6.8).

^{10.9}The matlab below illustrates the construction of a parallel formant filter bank for simulating the vowel . For completeness, it is used to filter a bandlimited impulse train, in order to synthesize the vowel sound.

F = [700, 1220, 2600]; % Formant frequencies (Hz) BW = [130, 70, 160]; % Formant bandwidths (Hz) fs = 8192; % Sampling rate (Hz) nsecs = length(F); R = exp(-pi*BW/fs); % Pole radii theta = 2*pi*F/fs; % Pole angles poles = R .* exp(j*theta); % Complex poles B = 1; A = real(poly([poles,conj(poles)])); % freqz(B,A); % View frequency response: % Convert to parallel complex one-poles (PFE): [r,p,f] = residuez(B,A); As = zeros(nsecs,3); Bs = zeros(nsecs,3); % complex-conjugate pairs are adjacent in r and p: for i=1:2:2*nsecs k = 1+(i-1)/2; Bs(k,:) = [r(i)+r(i+1), -(r(i)*p(i+1)+r(i+1)*p(i)), 0]; As(k,:) = [1, -(p(i)+p(i+1)), p(i)*p(i+1)]; end sos = [Bs,As]; % standard second-order-section form iperr = norm(imag(sos))/norm(sos); % make sure sos is ~real disp(sprintf('||imag(sos)||/||sos|| = %g',iperr)); % 1.6e-16 sos = real(sos) % and make it exactly real % Reconstruct original numerator and denominator as a check: [Bh,Ah] = psos2tf(sos); % parallel sos to transfer function % psos2tf appears in the matlab-utilities appendix disp(sprintf('||A-Ah|| = %g',norm(A-Ah))); % 5.77423e-15 % Bh has trailing epsilons, so we'll zero-pad B: disp(sprintf('||B-Bh|| = %g',... norm([B,zeros(1,length(Bh)-length(B))] - Bh))); % 1.25116e-15 % Plot overlay and sum of all three % resonator amplitude responses: nfft=512; H = zeros(nsecs+1,nfft); for i=1:nsecs [Hiw,w] = freqz(Bs(i,:),As(i,:)); H(1+i,:) = Hiw(:).'; end H(1,:) = sum(H(2:nsecs+1,:)); ttl = 'Amplitude Response'; xlab = 'Frequency (Hz)'; ylab = 'Magnitude (dB)'; sym = ''; lgnd = {'sum','sec 1','sec 2', 'sec 3'}; np=nfft/2; % Only plot for positive frequencies wp = w(1:np); Hp=H(:,1:np); figure(1); clf; myplot(wp,20*log10(abs(Hp)),sym,ttl,xlab,ylab,1,lgnd); disp('PAUSING'); pause; saveplot('../eps/lpcexovl.eps'); % Now synthesize the vowel [a]: nsamps = 256; f0 = 200; % Pitch in Hz w0T = 2*pi*f0/fs; % radians per sample nharm = floor((fs/2)/f0); % number of harmonics sig = zeros(1,nsamps); n = 0:(nsamps-1); % Synthesize bandlimited impulse train for i=1:nharm, sig = sig + cos(i*w0T*n); end; sig = sig/max(sig); speech = filter(1,A,sig); soundsc([sig,speech]); % hear buzz, then 'ah'

**Notes:**

- The sampling rate was chosen to be Hz because that is the default Matlab sampling rate, and because that is a typical value used for ``telephone quality'' speech synthesis.
- The
`psos2tf`utility is listed in §J.7. - The overlay of the amplitude responses are shown in Fig.9.6.

### Butterworth Lowpass Filter Example

This example illustrates the design of a 5th-order Butterworth lowpass filter, implementing it using second-order sections. Since all three sections contribute to the same passband and stopband, it is numerically advisable to choose a*series*second-order-section implementation, so that their passbands and stopbands will multiply together instead of add.

fc = 1000; % Cut-off frequency (Hz) fs = 8192; % Sampling rate (Hz) order = 5; % Filter order [B,A] = butter(order,2*fc/fs); % [0:pi] maps to [0:1] here [sos,g] = tf2sos(B,A) % sos = % 1.00000 2.00080 1.00080 1.00000 -0.92223 0.28087 % 1.00000 1.99791 0.99791 1.00000 -1.18573 0.64684 % 1.00000 1.00129 -0.00000 1.00000 -0.42504 0.00000 % % g = 0.0029714 % % Compute and display the amplitude response Bs = sos(:,1:3); % Section numerator polynomials As = sos(:,4:6); % Section denominator polynomials [nsec,temp] = size(sos); nsamps = 256; % Number of impulse-response samples % Note use of input scale-factor g here: x = g*[1,zeros(1,nsamps-1)]; % SCALED impulse signal for i=1:nsec x = filter(Bs(i,:),As(i,:),x); % Series sections end % %plot(x); % Plot impulse response to make sure % it has decayed to zero (numerically) % % Plot amplitude response % (in Octave - Matlab slightly different): figure(2); X=fft(x); % sampled frequency response f = [0:nsamps-1]*fs/nsamps; grid('on'); axis([0 fs/2 -100 5]); legend('off'); plot(f(1:nsamps/2),20*log10(X(1:nsamps/2)));The final plot appears in Fig.9.7. A Matlab function for frequency response plots is given in §J.4. (Of course, one can also use

`freqz`in either Matlab or Octave, but that function uses subplots which are not easily printable in Octave.) Note that the Matlab Signal Processing Toolbox has a function called

`sosfilt`so that ``

`y=sosfilt(sos,x)`'' will implement an array of second-order sections without having to unpack them first as in the example above.

### Summary of Series/Parallel Filter Sections

In summary, we noted above the following general guidelines regarding series vs. parallel elementary-section implementations:- Series sections are preferred when all sections contribute to the
*same passband*, such as in a lowpass, highpass, bandpass, or bandstop filter. - Parallel sections are usually preferred when
the sections have
*disjoint passbands*, such as a formant filter bank used in voice models. Another example would be the*phase vocoder*filter bank [21].

**Next Section:**

Pole-Zero Analysis Problems

**Previous Section:**

The Four Direct Forms