Ideal String Struck by a Mass
In §
4.5, we
discussed the
ideal struck string modeled as a simple initial
velocity
distribution along the string, corresponding to an instantaneous
transfer of
linear momentum from the striking hammer into the
transverse motion of a string segment at time zero. (See Fig.
4.9 for a diagram of the initial
traveling velocity waves.) In that model, we neglected any effect of
the striking hammer after time zero, as if it had bounced away at time
0 due to a so-called
elastic collision. In this section, we
will consider the more realistic case of an
inelastic collision,
i.e., where the mass hits the string and
sticks to it until
something, such as a wave, pushes it away from the string.
For simplicity, let the string length be infinity, and denote its wave
impedance by
. Denote the colliding mass by
and its speed by
. It will turn out in this analysis that we may approximate the
size of the mass by zero (a so-called point mass). Finally, we
neglect the effects of gravity and drag by the surrounding air. When
the mass collides with the string, our model must switch from two
separate models (mass-in-flight and ideal string), to that of two
ideal strings joined by a mass
at
, as depicted in
Fig.4.20. The connections of the mass impedance with the
two semi-infinite string endpoint impedances are formally in
series because they all move together; that is, the mass
velocity equals the velocity of each of the two string endpoints
connected to the mass. (See
§L.2 for a fuller discussion of
impedances and their parallel/series connection.)
The equivalent circuit for the mass-string assembly after time zero is
shown in Fig.4.21. Note that the string wave impedance
appears twice, once for each string segment on the left and right.
Also note that there is a single common velocity
for the two
string endpoints and mass. Impedances in series can be arranged in
any order.
Figure 4.21:
Electrical equivalent circuit for the mass and
two string endpoints after time zero. The mass is represented by an
inductor of
Henrys which has impedance
, while each string endpoint is
represented by a resistor of
Ohms (impedance
).
 |
From the equivalent circuit, it is easy to solve for the velocity
.
Formally, this is accomplished by applying Kirchoff's Loop Rule, which
states that the sum of voltages (``forces'') around any series loop is zero:
 |
(5.17) |
All the signs are ``

'' in this equation because the current
(``velocity''

) flows positively into the

sign of each
impedance. (Note the
reference directions indicated by

in
Fig.
4.21.) Taking the
Laplace transform5.9of this equation
yields, by linearity of the Laplace transform,
 |
(5.18) |
where

denotes the Laplace transform of

, and

denotes the Laplace transform of

.
As discussed above, the impedance relation for each
string endpoint is given by
where

denotes the Laplace transform of

.
For the mass, we have
where we used the
differentiation theorem for Laplace transforms
[
460, Appendix B].
5.10The impedance

of a mass

is
discussed further in §
L.1.
Substituting these relations into Eq.
(4.18) yields
and solving for

gives
Since the Laplace transform of

is

, where

denotes the
Heaviside unit step function,
5.11 we find the velocity of the contact point
to be
We see that at time zero the mass velocity is

, as it must be,
and after that it decays exponentially to zero with
time-constant

. The decay rate depends on the ratio of the mass to the
string wave impedance. In particular, the heavier the mass, the
slower the mass velocity decays to zero. Since

,
the greater the string tension

or mass-density

, the
faster the mass velocity decays to zero.
The displacement of the string at
is given by the integral of
the velocity:
where we defined the initial transverse displacement as

.
The final displacement of the string is
Thus, the final string displacement is proportional to both
the ``hammer mass'' and the initial striking velocity; it is inversely
proportional to the string wave impedance

.
The momentum of the mass before time zero is
, and after time
zero it is
The force applied to the two string endpoints by the mass is given by
. From Newton's Law,
, we have that
momentum
, delivered by the mass to the string,
can be calculated as the time integral of applied force:
Thus, the momentum delivered to the string by the mass starts out at
zero, and grows as a relaxing
exponential to

at time infinity.
We see that an ideal string struck inelastically by a mass does not at
all correspond to an instantaneous momentum transfer, as considered in
§
4.5. Instead, the mass's momentum is
transferred over a
period of time (in this case infinite time). This
is why it is possible to approximate the mass width by zero in this
analysis, unlike in the excitation-by-initial-velocity in §
4.5.
In a real piano, the hammer, which strikes in an upward direction,
falls away from the string a short time after collision, but it may
remain in contact with the string for a substantial fraction of a
period (see Chapter 5
on piano modeling).
Subsections
Previous:
SummaryNext:
Mass Termination Model
written by Julius Orion Smith III
Julius Smith's background is in electrical engineering (BS Rice 1975, PhD Stanford 1983). He is presently Professor of Music and Associate Professor (by courtesy) of Electrical Engineering at
Stanford's Center for Computer Research in Music and Acoustics (CCRMA), teaching courses and pursuing research related to signal processing applied to music and audio systems. See
http://ccrma.stanford.edu/~jos/ for details.